Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30515282›Full record

ArticleNutrition research and practice2018

Evaluation of antiproteinuric and hepato-renal protective activities of propolis in paracetamol toxicity in rats.

Nawal El Menyiy, Noori Al-Waili, Asmae El Ghouizi, Wail Al-Waili, Badiaa Lyoussi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Protective Potential ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Article
  4. Aleppo galls alleviate paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity and tissue damage: an experimental study.International journal of biochemistry and molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pretreatment withVeterinary world · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nawal El MenyiyLaboratory Physiology-Pharmacology & Environmental Health, Faculty of Sciences Dhar El Mehraz, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah, Fez 30000, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-2056
Noori Al-WailiNew York Medical Care for Nephrology, 87-40 134 Street, Richmond Hill, New York City, NY 11418, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-4444
Asmae El GhouiziLaboratory Physiology-Pharmacology & Environmental Health, Faculty of Sciences Dhar El Mehraz, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah, Fez 30000, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7136-8422
Wail Al-WailiNew York Medical Care for Nephrology, 87-40 134 Street, Richmond Hill, New York City, NY 11418, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1429-3129
Badiaa LyoussiLaboratory Physiology-Pharmacology & Environmental Health, Faculty of Sciences Dhar El Mehraz, University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdallah, Fez 30000, Morocco.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6090-6558
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University · MARichmond University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPropolis has a rich source of bioactive compounds and has renal and hepatic protective properties. The purpose of this study was to investigate the beneficial effect of hydro-ethanolic extract of propolis against paracetamol-induced liver damage and impairment of kidney function, as well as hematological changes in rats. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix groups of rats were used; the first group was served as a control; the second and third groups were treated by propolis extract at a dose of 50 and 100 mg/kg.B.WT. respectively; the fourth group was treated by paracetamol (200 mg/kg.B.WT.); the fifth group was treated by propolis (50 mg/kg.B.WT.) for eight days and then received similar dose of propolis for following seven days with paracetamol at a dose of 200 mg/kg.B.WT. daily for the seven days; and the sixth group was treated with propolis (100 mg/kg.B.WT.) for eight days and then received similar dose of propolis for following seven days with paracetamol at a dose of 200 mg/kg.B.WT. daily for the seven days. All the animals were treated for a period of 15 days. At the end of the experimental period, blood samples were collected for measurement of the liver enzymes, serum albumin, protein and creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, hematological parameters, and urine volume, protein and albumin.

resultsParacetamol over dose significantly lowered hemoglobin, serum total protein, albumin, and uric acid, while it significantly increased blood creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase activities, white blood cells, and platelet count as compared to the control. However, these alterations were significantly attenuated by the use of propolis extract and the effect was dose dependent. Interestingly, propolis prevented paracetamol induced proteinuria, low hemoglobin and body weight loss.

conclusionsPropolis significantly prevented paracetamol induced renal, hepatic and hematological toxicity and might be useful in the management of liver and renal diseases particularly proteinuria.

Indexed as

kidneyliverparacetamolPropolisproteinuria

Identifiers

PMID30515282
PMCPMC6277308
OpenAlexW2902541803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.