Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30515151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2018

DAMP-Inducing Adjuvant and PAMP Adjuvants Parallelly Enhance Protective Type-2 and Type-1 Immune Responses to Influenza Split Vaccination.

Tomoya Hayashi, Masatoshi Momota, Etsushi Kuroda, Takato Kusakabe, Shingo Kobari, Kotaro Makisaka, Yoshitaka Ohno, Yusuke Suzuki, Fumika Nakagawa, Michelle S J Lee and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Peptide Aggregation Induced Immunogenic Rupture (PAIIR).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Using PAMPs and DAMPs as adjuvants in cancer vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoya HayashiDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masatoshi MomotaLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, Center for Vaccine and Adjuvant Research, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.
Etsushi KurodaLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, Center for Vaccine and Adjuvant Research, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.
Takato KusakabeLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, Center for Vaccine and Adjuvant Research, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.
Shingo KobariLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, Center for Vaccine and Adjuvant Research, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.
Kotaro MakisakaDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yoshitaka OhnoDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yusuke SuzukiDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Fumika NakagawaDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Michelle S J LeeLaboratory of Malaria Immunology, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Cevayir CobanLaboratory of Malaria Immunology, Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Risako OnoderaBuilding Regional Innovation Ecosystems, School of Pharmacy, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Taishi HigashiDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Keiichi MotoyamaDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Ken J IshiiLaboratory of Adjuvant Innovation, Center for Vaccine and Adjuvant Research, National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetoshi ArimaDepartment of Physical Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JPNational Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, it was reported that 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CyD), a common pharmaceutical additive, can act as a vaccine adjuvant to enhance protective type-2 immunogenicity to co-administered seasonal influenza split vaccine by inducing host-derived damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). However, like most other DAMP-inducing adjuvants such as aluminum hydroxide (Alum), HP-β-CyD may not be sufficient for the induction of protective type-1 (cellular) immune responses, thereby leaving room for improvement. Here, we demonstrate that a combination of HP-β-CyD with a humanized TLR9 agonist, K3 CpG-ODN, a potent pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), enhanced the protective efficacy of the co-administered influenza split vaccine by inducing antigen-specific type-2 and type-1 immune responses, respectively. Moreover, substantial antigen-specific IgE induction by HP-β-CyD, which can cause an allergic response to immunized antigen was completely suppressed by the addition of K3 CpG-ODN. Furthermore, HP-β-CyD- and K3 CpG-ODN-adjuvanted influenza split vaccination protected the mice against lethal challenge with high doses of heterologous influenza virus, which could not be protected against by single adjuvant vaccines. Further experiments using gene deficient mice revealed the unique immunological mechanism of action

Indexed as

2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrinAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlarminsAnimalsAntibodies, ViralB-LymphocytesCells, CulturedDendritic CellsFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesLymphocyte ActivationMice2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrinAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlarminsAntibodies, ViralCPG-oligonucleotideInfluenza VaccinesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern MoleculesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTbk1 protein, mouseToll-Like Receptor 92-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrinadjuvantdamage-associated molecular patternsinfluenza split vaccineK3 CpG-ODNpathogen-associated molecular patterns

Identifiers

PMID30515151
PMCPMC6255964
OpenAlexW2901493207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.