Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30515071›Full record

SynthesisOccupational therapy international2018

A Systematic Review of Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Instruments for the Selection of Assistive Technologies.

Bárbara Iansã de Lima Barroso, Cláudia Regina Cabral Galvão, Luiz Bueno da Silva, Selma Lancman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational therapy international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Stapesplasty Outcome Test 25 (SPOT-25) for measurement of disease-specific health-related quality of life in Dutch otosclerosis patients: a prospective study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bárbara Iansã de Lima BarrosoGraduate Student of the Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine FMUSP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3591-4350
Cláudia Regina Cabral GalvãoGraduate Student of the Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine FMUSP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Luiz Bueno da SilvaProfessor of the Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering, Federal University of Paraíba UFPB, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil.
Selma LancmanProfessor of the Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences. Faculty of Medicine FMUSP, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review, for which research was carried out in the following electronic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ERIC, in which several articles were found (

Indexed as

Occupational TherapySelf-Help DevicesSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsCultural CompetencyHumansPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID30515071
PMCPMC6236878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.