ArticleMateria socio-medica2018
Negative Appendectomy Rate and Risk Factors That Influence Improper Diagnosis at King Abdulaziz University Hospital.
Article in Materia socio-medica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Negative Appendectomy Rates and Their Correlation With the Use of Histopathology: A Clinical Audit.Cureus · 2026Article
- Assessment of negative appendectomy in acute appendicitis diagnoses.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Article
- Incidental Neoplasm and Histopathological Spectrum of Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Appendectomy Specimen: An Observational Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Observational
- Observational
- Risk Factors Associated With Negative Appendicectomy Rates: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
- Adult appendicitis score versus Alvarado score: A comparative study in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Surgery open science · 2023Article
- Self-Locking Polymeric Clips Are Safe for the Closure of Appendiceal Stump in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Outcomes of the Macroscopically Normal Appendix Left in Situ in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Role of preoperative computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and reduction of negative appendectomy rates: Retrospective cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- The Dynamics of Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Role of platelet indices as a biomarker for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and as a predictor of complicated appendicitis: A meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute Appendicitis is the most common emergent abdominal surgery worldwide. diagnosis based on clinical assessment, laboratory and radiological investigations and appendectomy is the treatment of choice. Removing a normal appendix is a relatively common surgical issue, defined as negative appendectomy (NA). Multiple risk factors contribute to NA; female gender, normal WBC, normal CRP count, and CT scan unavailability. However, recently NA is decreasing in incidence after CT scan and Alvarado scoring.
aimWe aimed to estimate the rate of negative appendectomy, and determine possible risk factors among King Abdulaziz University Hospital. PATIENTS AND
methodsArticle has a retrospective character and included non-incidental 441 patients who undergo an appendectomy, during period 2008 to 2018.
resultsNegative Appendectomy incidence (9.5%) was higher among females at (64.3%). Gynecological complaints were seen in (22.2%) of cases with a sign for Negative Appendectomy. Surgery reports documented (29.6%) of female ovarian cyst diseases. Alvarado scoring at presentation was less than 7 in (69%) of cases with statistical significance value. Normal WBC count (50%), for automated neutrophil (45.2%) was high, and same number were recorded with the normal neutrophil count, all of them have statically significant relation with NA.
conclusionProper clinical evaluation involves documenting Alvarado score, using CRP, efficient radiological utilization. Also, considering more referrals to gynecological specialists of similar presentation especially females at reproductive age. Investing in time and equipment for proper clinical assessment can avoid the unnecessary burden and save our resources for better use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.