Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30515062›Full record

ArticleMateria socio-medica2018

Negative Appendectomy Rate and Risk Factors That Influence Improper Diagnosis at King Abdulaziz University Hospital.

Yara F Alhamdani, Hisham A Rizk, Mohammed R Algethami, Asma M Algarawi, Roia H Albadawi, Sofana N Faqih, Elaf H Ahmed, Ohud J Abukammas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materia socio-medica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yara F AlhamdaniKing Abdulaziz University, Medical School, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hisham A RizkDepartment of General Surgery, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed R AlgethamiKing Abdulaziz University, Medical School, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Asma M AlgarawiKing Abdulaziz University, Medical School, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Roia H AlbadawiKing Abdulaziz University, Medical School, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sofana N FaqihKing Abdulaziz University, Medical School, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Elaf H AhmedKing Abdulaziz University, Medical School, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ohud J AbukammasKing Abdulaziz University, Medical School, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SAJeddah University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute Appendicitis is the most common emergent abdominal surgery worldwide. diagnosis based on clinical assessment, laboratory and radiological investigations and appendectomy is the treatment of choice. Removing a normal appendix is a relatively common surgical issue, defined as negative appendectomy (NA). Multiple risk factors contribute to NA; female gender, normal WBC, normal CRP count, and CT scan unavailability. However, recently NA is decreasing in incidence after CT scan and Alvarado scoring.

aimWe aimed to estimate the rate of negative appendectomy, and determine possible risk factors among King Abdulaziz University Hospital. PATIENTS AND

methodsArticle has a retrospective character and included non-incidental 441 patients who undergo an appendectomy, during period 2008 to 2018.

resultsNegative Appendectomy incidence (9.5%) was higher among females at (64.3%). Gynecological complaints were seen in (22.2%) of cases with a sign for Negative Appendectomy. Surgery reports documented (29.6%) of female ovarian cyst diseases. Alvarado scoring at presentation was less than 7 in (69%) of cases with statistical significance value. Normal WBC count (50%), for automated neutrophil (45.2%) was high, and same number were recorded with the normal neutrophil count, all of them have statically significant relation with NA.

conclusionProper clinical evaluation involves documenting Alvarado score, using CRP, efficient radiological utilization. Also, considering more referrals to gynecological specialists of similar presentation especially females at reproductive age. Investing in time and equipment for proper clinical assessment can avoid the unnecessary burden and save our resources for better use.

Indexed as

Acute AppendicitisAppendectomyC-Reactive ProteinLeukocytes

Identifiers

PMID30515062
PMCPMC6195398
OpenAlexW2891464981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.