Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514803›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2019

Imatinib dose reduction in major molecular response of chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the German Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV.

Christian Michel, Andreas Burchert, Andreas Hochhaus, Susanne Saussele, Andreas Neubauer, Michael Lauseker, Stefan W Krause, Hans-Jochem Kolb, Dieter Kurt Hossfeld, Christoph Nerl and 51 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Is There a Role for Dose Modification of TKI Therapy in CML?Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

61 authors.

Christian MichelUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Campus Marburg, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Philipps Universität Marburg, Germany.
Andreas BurchertUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Campus Marburg, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Philipps Universität Marburg, Germany burchert@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Andreas HochhausKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Jena, Germany.
Susanne SausseleIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas NeubauerUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Campus Marburg, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Philipps Universität Marburg, Germany.
Michael LausekerInstitut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Stefan W KrauseMedizinische Klinik 5, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Germany.
Hans-Jochem KolbMedizinische Klinik III, Universität München, Germany.
Dieter Kurt HossfeldMedizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph NerlKlinikum Schwabing, Munich, Germany.
Gabriela M BaerlocherInselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik HeimUniversitätsspital, Basel, Switzerland.
Tim H BrümmendorfRWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Alice FabariusIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Claudia HaferlachMLL, Munich, Germany.
Brigitte SchlegelbergerInstitut für Humangenetik, MHH, Hannover, Germany.
Leopold BalleisenEv. Krankenhaus, Hamm, Germany.
Maria-Elisabeth GoebelerComprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken und Medizinische Klinik II, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Würzburg, Germany.
Mathias HänelKlinik für Innere Medizin 3, Chemnitz, Germany.
Anthony HoMedizinische Klinik V, Universität Heidelberg, Germany.
Jolanta DenglerOnkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Heilbronn, Germany.
Christiane FalgeMedizinische Klinik 5, Klinikum Nürnberg-Nord, Germany.
Robert MöhleMedizinische Abteilung 2, Universitätsklinikum, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephan KremersCaritas Krankenhaus, Lebach, Germany.
Michael Kneba2. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Frank StegelmannKlinik für Innere Medizin 3, Universitätsklinikum, Ulm, Germany.
Claus-Henning KöhneUniversitätsklinik für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Oldenburg, Germany.
Hans-Walter LindemannSt Marien-Hospital, Hagen, Germany.
Cornelius F WallerInnere Medizin 1, Universitätsklinikum, Freiburg, Germany.
Karsten SpiekermannMedizinische Klinik III, Universität München, Germany.
Wolfgang E BerdelMedizinische Klinik A, Universitätsklinikum, Münster, Germany.
Lothar MüllerOnkologie Leer Unter Ems, Leer, Germany.
Matthias EdingerKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 3, Universitätsklinikum, Regensburg, Germany.
Jiri MayerMasaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic.
Dietrich W BeelenKlinik für Knochenmarktransplantation, Essen, Germany.
Martin BentzMedizinische Klinik 3, Städtisches Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Hartmut LinkHematology, Medical Oncology, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Bernd Hertenstein1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany.
Roland FuchsRWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Martin WernliKantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland.
Frank SchlegelSt Antonius-Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany.
Rudolf SchlagHämatologische-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Würzburg, Germany.
Maike de WitKlinik für Innere Medizin II, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Lorenz TrümperKlinik für Hämatologie und medizinische Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin, Göttingen, Germany.
Holger HebartStauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd, Mutlangen, Germany.
Markus HahnOnkologie Zentrum, Ansbach, Germany.
Jörg ThomallaPraxisklinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Koblenz, Germany.
Christof ScheidKlinik 1 für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum, Köln, Germany.
Philippe SchafhausenMedizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Walter VerbeekAmbulante Hämatologie und Onkologie, Bonn, Germany.
Michael J EckartInternistische Schwerpunktpraxis, Erlangen, Germany.
Winfried GassmannSt Marien-Krankenhaus, Siegen, Germany.
Michael SchenkBarmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter BrossartMedizinische Klinik 3, Universität, Bonn, Germany.
Thomas WündischUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Campus Marburg, Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Philipps Universität Marburg, Germany.
Thomas GeerDiakonie, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.
Stephan BildatMedizinische Klinik 2, Herford, Germany.
Erhardt SchäferOnkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany.
Joerg HasfordInstitut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Rüdiger HehlmannIII. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Markus PfirrmannInstitut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard first-line therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia is treatment with imatinib. In the randomized German Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV, more potent BCR-ABL inhibition with 800 mg ('high-dose') imatinib accelerated achievement of a deep molecular remission. However, whether and when a de-escalation of the dose intensity under high-dose imatinib can be safely performed without increasing the risk of losing deep molecular response is unknown. To gain insights into this clinically relevant question, we analyzed the outcome of imatinib dose reductions from 800 mg to 400 mg daily in the Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV. Of the 422 patients that were randomized to the 800 mg arm, 68 reduced imatinib to 400 mg after they had achieved at least a stable major molecular response. Of these 68 patients, 61 (90%) maintained major molecular remission on imatinib at 400 mg. Five of the seven patients who lost major molecular remission on the imatinib standard dose regained major molecular remission while still on 400 mg imatinib. Only two of 68 patients had to switch to more potent kinase inhibition to regain major molecular remission. Importantly, the lengths of the intervals between imatinib high-dose treatment before and after achieving major molecular remission were associated with the probabilities of maintaining major molecular remission with the standard dose of imatinib. Taken together, the data support the view that a deep molecular remission achieved with high-dose imatinib can be safely maintained with standard dose in most patients. Study protocol registered at

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib Mesylate

Identifiers

PMID30514803
PMCPMC6518910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.