ArticleBiophysical journal2018
A Statistical Model of Expansive Growth in Plant and Fungal Cells: The Case of Phycomyces.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell wall-driven mechanisms underlying emergent growth in phycomyces.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- ATP modulation of osmotically activated anionic current in the membrane of Phycomyces blakesleeanus sporangiophore.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biophysical Equations and Pressure Probe Experiments to Determine Altered Growth Processes after Changes in Environment, Development, and Mutations.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dimensionless numbers to study cell wall deformation of stiff mutants ofPlant direct · 2019Article
- Dimensionless Numbers to Analyze Expansive Growth Processes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expansive growth is a process by which walled cells of plants, algae, and fungi use turgor pressure to mediate irreversible wall deformation and regulate their shape and volume. The molecular structure of the primary cell wall must therefore perform multiple functions simultaneously, including providing structural support by combining elastic and irreversible deformation and facilitating the deposition of new material during growth. This is accomplished by a network of microfibrils and tethers composed of complex polysaccharides and proteins that can dynamically mediate the network topology via periodic detachment and reattachment events. Lockhart and Ortega have provided crucial macroscopic understanding of the expansive growth process through global biophysical models, but these models lack the connection to molecular processes that trigger network rearrangements in the wall. Interestingly, the helical growth of the fungal sporangiophores of Phycomyces blakesleeanus is attributed to a limited region (called the growth zone) where microfibrils are deposited, followed by reorientation and slip. Based on past evidence of dominant shear strain between microfibrils (slippage), we propose a mechanistic model of a network of sliding fibrils connected by tethers. A statistical approach is introduced to describe the population behavior of tethers that have elastic properties and the ability to break and reform in time. These properties are responsible for global cell wall mechanics such as creep and stress relaxation. Model predictions are compared with experiments from literature on stress relaxation and turgor pressure step up for the growing cells of P. blakesleeanus, which are later extended to incised pea (Pisum sativus L.) and the algae Chara corallina using the unique dimensionless number Π
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.