Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514402›Full record

ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2018

Preclinical pharmacokinetic evaluation to facilitate repurposing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and imatinib as antiviral agents.

Hari Krishna Ananthula, Scott Parker, Erin Touchette, R Mark Buller, Gopi Patel, Daniel Kalman, Johanna S Salzer, Nadia Gallardo-Romero, Victoria Olson, Inger K Damon and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Old drugs, new weapons: current trends in repurposing therapies against antimicrobial resistance.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Hari Krishna AnanthulaJames L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Scott ParkerDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Erin TouchetteDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
R Mark BullerDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Gopi PatelDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniel KalmanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Johanna S SalzerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nadia Gallardo-RomeroCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Victoria OlsonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Inger K DamonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tessa Moir-SavitzBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Larry SallansMass Spectrometry Facility, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Milton H WernerInhibikase Therapeutics, Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA.
Catherine M SherwinDivision Clinical Pharmacology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Pankaj B DesaiJames L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. pankaj.desai@uc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-1603
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USSaint Louis University · USEmory University · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USBattelle · USInhibikase Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) developed as anti-cancer drugs, also have anti-viral activity due to their ability to disrupt productive replication and dissemination in infected cells. Consequently, such drugs are attractive candidates for "repurposing" as anti-viral agents. However, clinical evaluation of therapeutics against infectious agents associated with high mortality, but low or infrequent incidence, is often unfeasible. The United States Food and Drug Administration formulated the "Animal Rule" to facilitate use of validated animal models for conducting anti-viral efficacy studies.

methodsTo enable such efficacy studies of two clinically approved TKIs, nilotinib, and imatinib, we first conducted comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in relevant rodent and non-rodent animal models. PK of these agents following intravenous and oral dosing were evaluated in C57BL/6 mice, prairie dogs, guinea pigs and Cynomolgus monkeys. Plasma samples were analyzed using an LC-MS/MS method. Secondarily, we evaluated the utility of allometry-based inter-species scaling derived from previously published data to predict the PK parameters, systemic clearance (CL) and the steady state volume of distribution (Vss) of these two drugs in prairie dogs, an animal model not tested thus far.

resultsMarked inter-species variability in PK parameters and resulting oral bioavailability was observed. In general, elimination half-lives of these agents in mice and guinea pigs were much shorter (1-3 h) relative to those in larger species such as prairie dogs and monkeys. The longer nilotinib elimination half-life in prairie dogs (i.v., 6.5 h and oral, 7.5 h), facilitated multiple dosing PK and safety assessment. The allometry-based predicted values of the Vss and CL were within 2.0 and 2.5-fold, respectively, of the observed values.

conclusionsOur results suggest that prairie dogs and monkeys may be suitable rodent and non-rodent species to perform further efficacy testing of these TKIs against orthopoxvirus infections. The use of rodent models such as C57BL/6 mice and guinea pigs for assessing pre-clinical anti-viral efficacy of these two TKIs may be limited due to short elimination and/or low oral bioavailability. Allometry-based correlations, derived from existing literature data, may provide initial estimates, which may serve as a useful guide for pre-clinical PK studies in untested animal models.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntiviral AgentsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug RepositioningFemaleGuinea PigsImatinib MesylateMacaca fascicularisMaleMice, Inbred C57BLProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrimidinesSciuridaeAntineoplastic AgentsAntiviral AgentsImatinib MesylatenilotinibProtein-Tyrosine KinasesPyrimidinesAllometryAnimal rulePharmacokineticsTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID30514402
PMCPMC6278073
OpenAlexW2902680340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.