Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514369›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Using the candidacy framework to understand how doctor-patient interactions influence perceived eligibility to seek help for cancer alarm symptoms: a qualitative interview study.

Sara Tookey, Cristina Renzi, Jo Waller, Christian von Wagner, Katriina L Whitaker

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Factors affecting the decision to investigate older adults with potential cancer symptoms: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.Family medicine and community health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara TookeyDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Cristina RenziDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Jo WallerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Christian von WagnerDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Katriina L WhitakerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK. k.whitaker@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0947-1840

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13276Cancer Research UK 18667Department of Health Policy Research Unit in Cancer Awareness, Screening and Early Diagnosis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'Candidacy' is concerned with the way people consider their eligibility for accessing health services. We used the Candidacy Framework to explore how the doctor-patient relationship can influence perceived eligibility to visit their General Practitioner (GP) among people experiencing cancer alarm symptoms.

methodsWe carried out a secondary analysis of qualitative interviews with 29 women and 33 men, aged ≥50 years experiencing cancer alarm symptoms, recruited through primary care. Interviews focused on symptom experience, help-seeking and primary care use. Framework analysis was used to analyse transcripts with a focus on GP-patient interactions.

resultsPerceived (im)permeability of services acted as a barrier to help-seeking, due to limited availability of appointments, time-limited communication and difficulties asserting candidacy. There was also a focal role of communication in building a positive doctor-patient relationship, with some participants describing resisting offers of appointments as a result of previous negative GP adjudication. These factors not only influenced the current consultation but had longer-term consequences for future consultation.

conclusionsCandidacy provides a valuable theoretical framework to understand the interactional factors of the doctor-patient relationship which influence perceived eligibility to seek help for possible cancer alarm symptoms. We have highlighted areas for targeted interventions to improve patient-centred care and improve earlier diagnosis.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAgedAppointments and SchedulesEarly Detection of CancerEligibility DeterminationFemaleGeneral PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchCandidacyEarly diagnosis of cancerHelp-seeking behaviourPrimary health careQualitative researchSigns and symptoms

Identifiers

PMID30514369
PMCPMC6278141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.