Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514317›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Using concept mapping to identify policy options and interventions towards people-centred health care services: a multi stakeholders perspective.

Christine Cécile Leyns, Jan De Maeseneer, Sara Willems

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing health system responsiveness to the needs of older people.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Workforce Development in Integrated Care: A Scoping Review.International journal of integrated care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine Cécile LeynsAsociación Interdisciplinaria de Atención Primaria de Salud - Bolivia, Calle Antezana N°686 esquina Salamanca, oficina 1D, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Christine.Leyns@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-0247-4368
Jan De MaeseneerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Campus UZ Gent, 6K3, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Campus UZ Gent, 6K3, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople-centred health care (PCC) services are identified by the WHO as important building blocks towards universal health coverage. In 2016 the WHO formulated a comprehensive framework on integrated PCC services based on an international expert consultation. Yet, expert opinions may fail to recognize the needs of all health system stakeholders. Therefore, a consultation method that includes the health workforce and laypersons, can be instrumental to elaborate this framework more in-depth. This research sought to identify participants' perspectives on policy options and interventions to achieve people-centred health care services from a multi stakeholder perspective.

methodsStudy participants, both laypersons and health professionals, were recruited in Belgium. A total of 53 participants engaged in one of the seven concept mapping workshops. In this workshop the concept mapping methodology developed by Trochim, a highly structured qualitative group method for brainstorming and idea sharing, was used to generate and structure participants´ perspectives on what is needed to achieve PCC services. The method was validated using the WHO framework.

resultsThe seven workshops together resulted in 452 different statements that were structured in a framework forming 35 clusters and four overarching domains. The four domains with their most prominent clusters were: (1) governance & policy with intersectoral health policies and affordable health for all; (2) health workforce with excellent communication skills, appreciation of health literacy challenges and respectful attitude based on cultural self-awareness; (3) integrated health services with a greater emphasis on prevention, health promotion and the availability of health education and (4) patient, person and community empowerment and participation with support for informal care, promotion of a healthy lifestyle and contextualised health education. Additionally, this study generated ideas that fitted into every single approach described in the WHO framework. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThis study shows that in order to achieve PCC a participative approach involving all stakeholders at all levels is needed. The concept mapping process is one of these approaches that brings together diverse stakeholders and foments their egalitarian and respectful participation. The framework that resulted from this study can inform future debate regarding planning, implementation and monitoring of PCC.

Indexed as

Concept FormationPatient-Centered CareAttitude of Health PersonnelBelgiumDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth EducationHealth LiteracyHealth PersonnelHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHealth Services ResearchHumansQualitative ResearchHealth educationHealth equityPolicyProfessional competenceStakeholder participation

Identifiers

PMID30514317
PMCPMC6278128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.