Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514295›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Patient preferences for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in the emergency department.

Safa S Almarzoky Abuhussain, Michelle A Burak, Kelsey N Kohman, Gabrielle Jacknin, Serina B Tart, Athena L V Hobbs, Danyel K Adams, Michael D Nailor, Katelyn R Keyloun, David P Nicolau and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Safa S Almarzoky AbuhussainCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
Michelle A BurakDepartment of Pharmacy, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Kelsey N KohmanDepartment of Pharmacy, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Gabrielle JackninDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Serina B TartDepartment of Pharmacy, Cape Fear Valley Health, Fayetteville, NC, USA.
Athena L V HobbsDepartment of Pharmacy, Baptist Memorial Hospital-Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Danyel K AdamsDepartment of Pharmacy, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA.
Michael D NailorDepartment of Pharmacy, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Katelyn R KeylounAllergan plc, Jersey City, NJ, USA.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA.
Joseph L KutiCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT, 06102, USA. joseph.kuti@hhchealth.org.
Hartford Hospital · USAllergan (United States) · USBaptist Memorial Hospital · USBaylor University Medical Center · USBaystate Medical Center · USCape Fear Valley Health System · USSt. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited research has assessed patient preferences for treatment disposition and antibiotic therapy of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) in the emergency department (ED). Understanding patient preference for the treatment of ABSSSI may influence treatment selection and improve satisfaction.

methodsA survey was conducted across 6 US hospital EDs. Patients with ABSSSI completed a baseline survey assessing preferences for antibiotic therapy (intravenous versus oral) and treatment location. A follow-up survey was conducted within 30-40 days after ED discharge to reassess preferences and determine satisfaction with care.

resultsA total of 94 patients completed both baseline and follow-up surveys. Sixty (63.8%) participants had a history of ABSSSI, and 69 (73.4%) were admitted to the hospital. Treatment at home was the most common preference reported on baseline and follow-up surveys. Patients with higher education were 82.2% less likely to prefer treatment in the hospital. Single dose intravenous therapy was the most commonly preferred antibiotic regimen on baseline and follow-up surveys (39.8 and 19.1%, respectively). Median satisfaction scores for care in the ED, hospital, home, and with overall antibiotic therapy were all 8 out of a maximum of 10.

conclusionsIn these patients, the most common preference was for outpatient care and single dose intravenous antibiotics. Patient characteristics including higher education, younger age, and current employment were associated with these preferences. Opportunities exist for improving ABSSSI care and satisfaction rates by engaging patients and offering multiple treatment choices.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAcute DiseaseAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSkin Diseases, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsABSSSIAntibiotic treatmentAntimicrobial stewardshipEmergency medicinePatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID30514295
PMCPMC6278032
OpenAlexW2902732065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.