ArticleBMC medical education2018
How to choose an evidence-based medicine knowledge test for medical students? Comparison of three knowledge measures.
Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Effect of a Clinical Decision Support System on Team-Based Clinical Quiz Performance Among Japanese Medical Students: A Pre-Post Pilot Study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- "I still have not mastered that skill!" Medical student perspectives on a simulation-based evidence-based medicine competency assessment.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2025Article
- Development of a Japanese version of the Fresno test for family physicians to measure evidence-based medicine competence.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and self-efficacy toward evidence-based medicine among resident physicians: a cross-sectional study from Qatar.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of two validated evidence-based medicine assessments: Do they correlate?AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Cognitive levels in testing knowledge in evidence-based medicine: a cross sectional study.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Article
- Validity and reliability of the Noor Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2021Article
- Implementation and evaluation of a self-directed learning activity for first-year medical students.Medical education online · 2020Article
- Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study.BMC medical education · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are a few studies of alignment between different knowledge-indices for evidence-based medicine (EBM). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the type of test used to assess knowledge of EBM affects the estimation of this knowledge in medical students.
methodsMedical students enrolled in 1-week EBM course were tested with the Fresno, Berlin, and ACE tests at the beginning and the end of the course. We evaluated the ability of these tests to detect a change in the acquired level of EBM knowledge and compared the estimates of change with those of the Control group that was tested with the ACE and Berlin tests before and after an unrelated non-EBM course. The distributions of test scores and average item difficulty indices were compared among the tests and the groups.
resultsTest scores improved on all three tests when compared with their pre-test results and the control. Students had on average a "good" performance on the ACE test, "sufficient" performance on the Berlin test, and "insufficient" performance or have "not passed" on the Fresno test. The post-test improvements in performance on the Fresno test (median 31% increase in percent scores, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25-42%) outperformed those on the ACE (13, 95% CI 13-20%) and Berlin tests (13, 95% CI 7-20%). Post-test score distributions demonstrated that the ACE test had less potential to discriminate between levels of EBM knowledge than other tests.
conclusionThe use of different EBM tests resulted in different assessment of general EBM knowledge in a sample of graduate medical students, with lowest results on the Fresno and highest on the ACE test. In the light of these findings, EBM knowledge assessment should be based on the course's content and learning objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.