Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514285›Full record

Trial reportBMC women's health2018

A randomised controlled trial of a personalised lifestyle coaching application in modifying periconceptional behaviours in women suffering from reproductive failures (iPLAN trial).

Ka Ying Bonnie Ng, Susan Wellstead, Ying Cheong, Nick Macklon

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC women's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ka Ying Bonnie NgHuman Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. bonnie.ng@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2770-6148
Susan WellsteadHuman Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Ying CheongHuman Development and Health Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Nick MacklonZealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Princess Anne Hospital · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Department of Health ACF-2015-26-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLifestyle, in particular obesity and smoking has significant impacts on fertility and an important focus for the treatment of reproductive failures is the optimisation of periconceptional lifestyle behaviours. The preimplantation intrauterine environment within the uterus is also key for embryo development and early programming. Although the benefits a healthy periconceptional lifestyle are well described, there remains a paucity of data demonstrating the efficacy of interventions designed to optimise preconceptional lifestyle behaviours and choices.

methodsThis study is a prospective randomised controlled trial which aims to address the question of whether an online personalised lifestyle coaching application is an effective means of delivering periconceptional advice in women suffering from reproductive failures. Women suffering from subfertility or recurrent miscarriages attending the outpatient clinic will be randomised into either the intervention arm (personalised online lifestyle coaching application) or the control arm (standard periconceptional advice including information from NHS websites). Both groups will be asked to complete a validated lifestyle questionnaire at baseline, and 6, 12, 18 and 24 weeks after randomisation. The primary outcome is the composite dietary and lifestyle risk score at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes will include compliance with the program, proportion achieving spontaneous conception during the study period and the dietary and lifestyle risk score at 24 weeks. DISCUSSION: With this study, we aim to clarify whether a personalised online based lifestyle coaching application is more effective at improving behaviours than standard advice offered by National Health Service (NHS) resources. A personalised lifestyle coaching application may represent an empowering and cost effective means of delivering periconceptional advice in women with subfertility or recurrent miscarriages.

trial registrationThe iPLAN trial was retrospectively registered ( ISRCTN 89523555 ).

Indexed as

Life StyleAdultBehavior TherapyCounselingFemaleHumansInfertilityInfertility, FemaleMentoringPrecision MedicineProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesCoachingLifestyleOnline applicationPericonceptional healthRandomised control trialSmartphone application

Identifiers

PMID30514285
PMCPMC6280350
OpenAlexW2902026919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.