Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514264›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

Sexual violence among adolescent girls and young women in Malawi: a cluster-randomized controlled implementation trial of empowerment self-defense training.

Michele R Decker, Shannon N Wood, Esther Ndinda, Gayane Yenokyan, Jacob Sinclair, Nankali Maksud, Brendan Ross, Benjamin Omondi, Martin Ndirangu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. "Okay, So It's Not Me"-TheInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Accelerating achievement for Africa's adolescents.Contemporary social science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele R DeckerDepartment of Population, Family & Reproductive Health Director, Women's Health & Rights Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. mdecker@jhu.edu.
Shannon N WoodDepartment of Population, Family & Reproductive Health Director, Women's Health & Rights Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Esther NdindaUjamaa-Pamodzi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Gayane YenokyanJohns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jacob SinclairUjamaa-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nankali MaksudUNICEF, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Brendan RossUNICEF, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Benjamin OmondiUjamaa-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Martin NdiranguUjamaa-Pamodzi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Johns Hopkins University · USLilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources · MW

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US) 1UL1TR001079NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, sexual violence is prevalent, particularly for adolescent women. This cluster-randomized controlled implementation trial examines empowerment self-defense (ESD) for sexual assault risk reduction among school-age women in Malawi.

methodsThe unit of randomization and analysis was the school (n = 141). Intervention participants received a 12-h intervention over 6 weeks, with refreshers. Primary outcomes were past-year prevalence and incident rate of sexual violence. Secondary outcomes included confidence, self-defense knowledge, and, for those victimized, violence disclosure. Interaction effects on outcomes were evaluated with Poisson models with school-correlated robust variance estimates for risk ratios and incident rate ratios (baseline n = 6644, follow-up n = 4278).

resultsPast-year sexual assault prevalence was reduced among intervention students (risk ratio [RR] 0.68, 95% CI 0.56, 0.82), but not control students (interaction effect p < 0.001). Significant increases in self-defense knowledge were observed solely among intervention students (RR 3.33, 95% CI 2.76, 4.02; interaction effect p < 0.001). Significant changes in sexual violence prevalence and knowledge were observed for both primary and secondary students. Favorable reductions were also observed in sexual violence incident rate among students overall (interaction effect p = 0.01).

conclusionsThis intervention reduced sexual violence victimization in both primary and secondary school settings. Results support the effectiveness of ESD to address sexual violence, and approach the elimination of violence against women and girls set forth with Sustainable Development Goal #5. Implementation within the education system can enable sustainability and reach.

trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201702002028911 . Registered 09 February 2017. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Physical Education and TrainingPower, PsychologicalAdolescentCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMalawiProgram EvaluationSex OffensesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30514264
PMCPMC6278011
OpenAlexW2902031039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.