Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514259›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Microsatellite instability test using peptide nucleic acid probe-mediated melting point analysis: a comparison study.

Mi Jang, Yujin Kwon, Hoguen Kim, Hyunki Kim, Byung Soh Min, Yehyun Park, Tae Il Kim, Sung Pil Hong, Won Kyu Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A standardized pathology report for gastric cancer: 2nd edition.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Molecular Pathology of Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mi JangDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Yujin KwonDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Hoguen KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Hyunki KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Byung Soh MinDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Yehyun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Tae Il KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Sung Pil HongDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, W120NN, UK.
Won Kyu KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. wkkim@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5531-9500
Yonsei University · KRImperial College London · GB

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI16C0257Small and Medium Business Administration S2392537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalysis of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) phenotype in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is important for evaluating prognosis and choosing a proper adjuvant therapy. Although the conventional MSI analysis methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) show high specificity and sensitivity, there are substantial barriers to their use.

methodsIn this study, we analyzed the MSI detection performance of three molecular tests and IHC. For the molecular tests, we included a recently developed peptide nucleic acid probe (PNA)-mediated real-time PCR-based method using five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeat markers (PNA method) and two conventional PCR fragment analysis methods using NCI markers (NCI method) or five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeat markers (MNR method). IHC analysis was performed with four mismatch repair proteins. The performance of each method was validated in 166 CRC patient samples, which consisted of 76 MSI-H and 90 microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCs previously diagnosed by NCI method.

resultsOf the 166 CRCs, 76 MSI-H and 90 MSS CRCs were determined by PNA method. On the other hand, 75 MSI-H and 91 MSS CRCs were commonly determined by IHC and MNR methods. Based on the originally diagnosed MSI status, PNA showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity while IHC and MNR showed 98.68% sensitivity and 100% specificity. When we analyzed the maximum sensitivity of MNR and PNA method, which used the same five markers, PNA method could detect alterations in all five mononucleotide repeat markers in samples containing down to 5% MSI-H DNAs, whereas MNR required at least 20% MSI-H DNAs to achieve the same performance.

conclusionsBased on these findings, we suggest that PNA method can be used as a practical laboratory test for the diagnosis of MSI.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsHeLa CellsHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPeptide Nucleic AcidsPolymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorPeptide Nucleic AcidsColorectal cancerMicrosatellite instabilityPeptide nucleic acid probe and immunohistochemistryReal-time polymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID30514259
PMCPMC6280403
OpenAlexW2903232821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.