ArticleBMC cancer2018
Projected lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea.
Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Occupational diseases in dentistry: Prevention.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Occupational radiation exposure and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of Canadian medical workers.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2026Article
- Radioprotective Effect of Ascorbic Acid: A Need for Prophylactic Supplementation Pre- and Post-Radiation Exposure Among Patients and Healthcare Workers-A Perspective Article.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Occupational radiation exposure of zoo veterinarians during x-ray procedures: a real-time dosimetry study.Journal of occupational health · 2026Observational
- Pb-free metal oxide-based epoxy resin nanocomposites for radiation protection: Physical evaluation analysis approach.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Medical Device Aging and Replacement Decisions within Hospital Environments: A User-Centered Approach.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- X-ray scatter in projection radiography.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2024Article
- Article
- The Acute Effect of Multi-Ingredient Antioxidant Supplementation following Ionizing Radiation.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Whole-body radiation exposure in Trauma and Orthopaedic surgery.Bone & joint open · 2022Article
- Data integration of National Dose Registry and survey data using multivariate imputation by chained equations.PloS one · 2022Article
- Occupational radiation exposure and cancer incidence in a cohort of diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2021Article
- Occupational radiation exposure in doctors: an analysis of exposure rates over 25 years.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- An assessment of radiation use, knowledge and concerns in trainee cardiologists in Ireland.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Brain Damage and Patterns of Neurovascular Disorder after Ionizing Irradiation. Complications in Radiotherapy and Radiation Combined Injury.Radiation research · 2021Review
- Projected lifetime cancer risk from cone-beam computed tomography for orthodontic treatment.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2021Article
- Breast cancer and occupational exposures: an integrative review of the literature.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT · 2021Review
- Lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among workers at interventional radiology departments.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021Article
- Attitudes to radiation safety and cholangiogram interpretation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a UK survey.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTimely assessment of cancer risk from current radiation exposure among medical radiation workers can contribute to the development of strategies to prevent excessive occupational radiation exposure. The purpose of the present study is to estimate the lifetime risk of cancers induced by occupational radiation exposure among medical radiation workers.
methodsUsing estimated organ doses and the RadRAT risk assessment tool, the lifetime cancer risk was estimated among medical radiation workers who were enrolled in the Korean National Dose Registry from 1996 to 2011. Median doses were used for estimating the risk because of the skewed distribution of radiation doses. Realistic representative exposure scenarios in the study population based on sex, job start year, and occupational group were created for calculating the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) and lifetime fractional risk (LFR).
resultsThe mean estimated lifetime cancer risk from occupational radiation exposure varied significantly by sex and occupational group. The highest LAR was observed in male and female radiologic technologists who started work in 1991 (264.4/100,000 and 391.2/100,000, respectively). Female workers had a higher risk of radiation-related excess cancer, although they were exposed to lower radiation doses than male workers. The higher LAR among women was attributable primarily to excess breast and thyroid cancer risks. LARs among men were higher than women in most other cancer sites. With respect to organ sites, LAR of colon cancer (44.3/100,000) was the highest in male radiologic technologists, whereas LAR of thyroid cancer (222.0/100,000) was the highest in female radiologic technologists among workers who started radiologic practice in 1991. Thyroid and bladder cancers had the highest LFR among radiologic technologists.
conclusionsOur findings provide an assessment of the potential cancer risk from occupational radiation exposure among medical radiation workers, based on current knowledge about radiation risk. Although the radiation-related risk was small in most cases, it varied widely by sex and occupational group, and the risk would be underestimated due to the use of median, rather than mean, doses. Therefore, careful monitoring is necessary to optimize radiation doses and protect medical radiation workers from potential health risks, particularly female radiologic technologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.