Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514234›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018

Lasso regularization for left-censored Gaussian outcome and high-dimensional predictors.

Perrine Soret, Marta Avalos, Linda Wittkop, Daniel Commenges, Rodolphe Thiébaut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Perrine SoretUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, F-33000, France.
Marta AvalosUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, F-33000, France. marta.avalos-fernandez@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-2615
Linda WittkopUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, F-33000, France.
Daniel CommengesUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, F-33000, France.
Rodolphe ThiébautUniv. Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, F-33000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiological assays for the quantification of markers may suffer from a lack of sensitivity and thus from an analytical detection limit. This is the case of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load. Below this threshold the exact value is unknown and values are consequently left-censored. Statistical methods have been proposed to deal with left-censoring but few are adapted in the context of high-dimensional data.

methodsWe propose to reverse the Buckley-James least squares algorithm to handle left-censored data enhanced with a Lasso regularization to accommodate high-dimensional predictors. We present a Lasso-regularized Buckley-James least squares method with both non-parametric imputation using Kaplan-Meier and parametric imputation based on the Gaussian distribution, which is typically assumed for HIV viral load data after logarithmic transformation. Cross-validation for parameter-tuning is based on an appropriate loss function that takes into account the different contributions of censored and uncensored observations. We specify how these techniques can be easily implemented using available R packages. The Lasso-regularized Buckley-James least square method was compared to simple imputation strategies to predict the response to antiretroviral therapy measured by HIV viral load according to the HIV genotypic mutations. We used a dataset composed of several clinical trials and cohorts from the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research (HIV Med. 2008;7:27-40). The proposed methods were also assessed on simulated data mimicking the observed data.

resultsApproaches accounting for left-censoring outperformed simple imputation methods in a high-dimensional setting. The Gaussian Buckley-James method with cross-validation based on the appropriate loss function showed the lowest prediction error on simulated data and, using real data, the most valid results according to the current literature on HIV mutations.

conclusionsThe proposed approach deals with high-dimensional predictors and left-censored outcomes and has shown its interest for predicting HIV viral load according to HIV mutations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLeast-Squares AnalysisModels, TheoreticalNormal DistributionComputer SimulationGenotypeHIV InfectionsHumansMutationOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisBuckley-James least squares procedureCross-sectional studiesDrug resistanceHIV genotypic mutationsHIV viral loadLimit of detection

Identifiers

PMID30514234
PMCPMC6280495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.