Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514201›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2018

Design of low density SNP chips for genotype imputation in layer chicken.

Florian Herry, Frédéric Hérault, David Picard Druet, Amandine Varenne, Thierry Burlot, Pascale Le Roy, Sophie Allais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florian HerryNOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, 22960, Plédran, France.
Frédéric HéraultPEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 16 Le Clos, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France.
David Picard DruetPEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 16 Le Clos, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France.
Amandine VarenneNOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, 22960, Plédran, France.
Thierry BurlotNOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, 22960, Plédran, France.
Pascale Le RoyPEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 16 Le Clos, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France.
Sophie AllaisPEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, 16 Le Clos, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France. sophie.allais@agrocampus-ouest.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-331X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main goal of selection is to achieve genetic gain for a population by choosing the best breeders among a set of selection candidates. Since 2013, the use of a high density genotyping chip (600K Affymetrix® Axiom® HD genotyping array) for chicken has enabled the implementation of genomic selection in layer and broiler breeding, but the genotyping costs remain high for a routine use on a large number of selection candidates. It has thus been deemed interesting to develop a low density genotyping chip that would induce lower costs. In this perspective, various simulation studies have been conducted to find the best way to select a set of SNPs for low density genotyping of two laying hen lines.

resultsTo design low density SNP chips, two methodologies, based on equidistance (EQ) or on linkage disequilibrium (LD) were compared. Imputation accuracy was assessed as the mean correlation between true and imputed genotypes. The results showed correlations more sensitive to false imputation of SNPs having low Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) when the EQ methodology was used. An increase in imputation accuracy was obtained when SNP density was increased, either through an increase in the number of selected windows on a chromosome or through the rise of the LD threshold. Moreover, the results varied depending on the type of chromosome (macro or micro-chromosome). The LD methodology enabled to optimize the number of SNPs, by reducing the SNP density on macro-chromosomes and by increasing it on micro-chromosomes. Imputation accuracy also increased when the size of the reference population was increased. Conversely, imputation accuracy decreased when the degree of kinship between reference and candidate populations was reduced. Finally, adding selection candidates' dams in the reference population, in addition to their sire, enabled to get better imputation results.

conclusionsWhichever the SNP chip, the methodology, and the scenario studied, highly accurate imputations were obtained, with mean correlations higher than 0.83. The key point to achieve good imputation results is to take into account chicken lines' LD when designing a low density SNP chip, and to include the candidates' direct parents in the reference population.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsChickensChromosomesGene FrequencyGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisDegree of kinshipImputation accuracyLayer chickensLinkage disequilibriumLow density chipMAFSNP density

Identifiers

PMID30514201
PMCPMC6278067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.