Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514200›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

The evolution of ependymin-related proteins.

Carmel McDougall, Michael J Hammond, Simon C Dailey, Ildiko M L Somorjai, Scott F Cummins, Bernard M Degnan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmel McDougallCentre for Marine Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Michael J HammondGeneCology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland, 4558, Australia.
Simon C DaileyGatty Marine Laboratory, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 8LB, UK.
Ildiko M L SomorjaiGatty Marine Laboratory, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 8LB, UK.
Scott F CumminsGeneCology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Queensland, 4558, Australia.
Bernard M DegnanCentre for Marine Science, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia. b.degnan@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7573-8518
University of St Andrews · GBUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AUGriffith University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 204821/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpendymins were originally defined as fish-specific secreted glycoproteins involved in central nervous system plasticity and memory formation. Subsequent research revealed that these proteins represent a fish-specific lineage of a larger ependymin-related protein family (EPDRs). EPDRs have now been identified in a number of bilaterian animals and have been implicated in diverse non-neural functions. The recent discoveries of putative EPDRs in unicellular holozoans and an expanded EPDR family with potential roles in conspecific communication in crown-of-thorns starfish suggest that the distribution and diversity of EPDRs is significantly broader than currently understood.

resultsWe undertook a systematic survey to determine the distribution and evolution of EPDRs in eukaryotes. In addition to Bilateria, EPDR genes were identified in Cnidaria, Placozoa, Porifera, Choanoflagellatea, Filasterea, Apusozoa, Amoebozoa, Charophyta and Percolozoa, and tentatively in Cercozoa and the orphan group Malawimonadidae. EPDRs appear to be absent from prokaryotes and many eukaryote groups including ecdysozoans, fungi, stramenopiles, alveolates, haptistans and cryptistans. The EPDR family can be divided into two major clades and has undergone lineage-specific expansions in a number of metazoan lineages, including in poriferans, molluscs and cephalochordates. Variation in a core set of conserved residues in EPDRs reveals the presence of three distinct protein types; however, 3D modelling predicts overall protein structures to be similar.

conclusionsOur results reveal an early eukaryotic origin of the EPDR gene family and a dynamic pattern of gene duplication and gene loss in animals. This research provides a phylogenetic framework for the analysis of the functional evolution of this gene family.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsEukaryotaEukaryotic CellsGene DuplicationModels, MolecularNerve Tissue ProteinsPhylogenyependyminsNerve Tissue ProteinsEPDRsEpendyminGene duplicationGene lossMERPs

Identifiers

PMID30514200
PMCPMC6280359
OpenAlexW2902470018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.