Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30514085›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019

Optimal Coarse-Grained Site Selection in Elastic Network Models of Biomolecules.

Patrick Diggins, Changjiang Liu, Markus Deserno, Raffaello Potestio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping Still Matters: Coarse-Graining with Machine Learning Potentials.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fast, Accurate, and System-Specific Variable-Resolution Modeling of Proteins.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring the landscape of model representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Optimizing model representation for integrative structure determination of macromolecular assemblies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick DigginsDepartment of Physics , Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 15213 , United States.
Changjiang LiuDepartment of Physics , Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 15213 , United States.
Markus DesernoDepartment of Physics , Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania 15213 , United States.
Raffaello PotestioPhysics Department , University of Trento , via Sommarive, 14 I-38123 Trento , Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6408-9380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elastic network models, simple structure-based representations of biomolecules where atoms interact via short-range harmonic potentials, provide great insight into a molecule's internal dynamics and mechanical properties at extremely low computational cost. Their efficiency and effectiveness have made them a pivotal instrument in the computer-aided study of proteins and, since a few years, also of nucleic acids. In general, the coarse-grained sites, i.e. those effective force centers onto which the all-atom structure is mapped, are constructed based on intuitive rules: a typical choice for proteins is to retain only the C

Indexed as

ElasticityModels, MolecularAdenineAdenylate KinaseNucleic Acid ConformationProtein ConformationRiboswitchAdenineAdenylate KinaseRiboswitch

Identifiers

PMID30514085
PMCPMC6391041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.