Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30513787›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2018

Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Diabetes by Volatile Organic Compounds in Urine Using FAIMS and Fox4000 Electronic Nose.

Siavash Esfahani, Alfian Wicaksono, Ella Mozdiak, Ramesh P Arasaradnam, James A Covington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siavash EsfahaniSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. S.Esfahani@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-2286
Alfian WicaksonoSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. a.wicaksono@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0425-1678
Ella MozdiakDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK. ella.mozdiak@nhs.net.
Ramesh P ArasaradnamDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK. R.Arasaradnam@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2231-3062
James A CovingtonSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. J.A.Covington@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-6488
University of Warwick · GBUniversity Hospital Coventry · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electronic nose (eNose) is an instrument designed to mimic the human olfactory system. Usage of eNose in medical applications is more popular than ever, due to its low costs and non-invasive nature. The eNose sniffs the gases and vapours that emanate from human waste (urine, breath, and stool) for the diagnosis of variety of diseases. Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) affects 8.3% of adults in the world, with 43% being underdiagnosed, resulting in 4.9 million deaths per year. In this study, we investigated the potential of urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for diabetes. In addition, we investigated the influence of sample age on the diagnostic accuracy of urinary VOCs. We analysed 140 urine samples (73 DM2, 67 healthy) with Field-Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS); a type of eNose; and FOX 4000 (AlphaM.O.S, Toulouse, France). Urine samples were collected at UHCW NHS Trust clinics over 4 years and stored at -80 °C within two hours of collection. Four different classifiers were used for classification, specifically Sparse Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gaussian Process, and Support Vector on both FAIMS and FOX4000. Both eNoses showed their capability of diagnosing DM2 from controls and the effect of sample age on the discrimination. FAIMS samples were analysed for all samples aged 0⁻4 years (AUC: 88%, sensitivity: 87%, specificity: 82%) and then sub group samples aged less than a year (AUC (Area Under the Curve): 94%, Sensitivity: 92%, specificity: 100%). FOX4000 samples were analysed for all samples aged 0⁻4 years (AUC: 85%, sensitivity: 77%, specificity: 85%) and a sub group samples aged less than 18 months: (AUC: 94%, sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 89%). We demonstrated that FAIMS and FOX 4000 eNoses can discriminate DM2 from controls using urinary VOCs. In addition, we showed that urine sample age affects discriminative accuracy.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseBiomarkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Early DiagnosisFemaleHumansIon Mobility SpectrometryLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityUrine Specimen CollectionVolatile Organic CompoundsBiomarkersVolatile Organic Compoundsbiosensordiabeteselectronic noseFAIMSFOX 4000medical applicationnon-invasive diagnosisurine samplevolatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

PMID30513787
PMCPMC6316010
OpenAlexW2903229701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.