Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30513724›Full record

ArticleToxins2018

Discovery of Novel Conotoxin Candidates Using Machine Learning.

Qing Li, Maren Watkins, Samuel D Robinson, Helena Safavi-Hemami, Mark Yandell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. In Silico Conotoxin Studies: Progress and Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Systemic antihyperalgesic effect of a novel conotoxin fromFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qing LiEccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. liqing850104@gmail.com.
Maren WatkinsDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. maren.watkins@hsc.utah.edu.
Samuel D RobinsonDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. s.robinson@imb.uq.edu.au.
Helena Safavi-HemamiDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. helena.safavi@utah.edu.
Mark YandellEccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. myandell@genetics.utah.edu.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Life history-guided drug discovery from venomous marine snailsR01GM122869 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI OLIVERA, BALDOMERO M, YANDELL, MARK DOUGLAS · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM122869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone snails (genus

Indexed as

AnimalsConotoxinsConus SnailMachine LearningSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeConotoxinscone snailsconotoxinsdrug discoverymachine learningvenom

Identifiers

PMID30513724
PMCPMC6315676
OpenAlexW2894434160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.