Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30513084›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Neurobiology of social reward valuation in adults with a history of anorexia nervosa.

Maggie M Sweitzer, Karli K Watson, Savannah R Erwin, Amy A Winecoff, Nandini Datta, Scott Huettel, Michael L Platt, Nancy L Zucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Does Evidence Support an Emotion Regulation Model of Anorexia Nervosa? A Systematic Review of Over a Decade of Research.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Experiences of mimicry in eating disorders.Journal of eating disorders · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maggie M SweitzerDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Karli K WatsonInstitute for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Savannah R ErwinDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Amy A WinecoffDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Nandini DattaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Scott HuettelDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Michael L PlattDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Nancy L ZuckerDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2278-5008

Funding

Targeting reward dysfunction as a mechanism to improve smoking cessationK23DA039294 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SWEITZER, MAGGIE M · 2016 to 2020
$817k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA039294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a disorder characterized by atypical patterns of reward valuation (e.g. positive valuation of hunger). Atypical reward processing may extend into social domains. If so, such findings would be of prognostic significance as impaired social functioning predicts worse outcome. We explore neural circuits implicated in social reward processing in individuals with a history of AN who are weight-restored relative to controls and examine the effects of illness course on the experience of social value.

method20 weight-restored individuals with a history of AN (AN-WR) and 24 healthy control (HC) participants were assessed using fMRI tasks that tapped social reward: smiling faces and full human figures that varied in attractiveness and weight.

resultsAN-WR differed from HC in attractiveness ratings by weight (negatively correlated in AN-WR). While there were no significant differences when viewing smiling faces, viewing full figures resulted in decreased activation in regions implicated in reward valuation (the right caudate) for AN-WR and this region was negatively correlated with a sustained course of the disorder. Exploratory whole brain analyses revealed reduced activation in regions associated with social reward, self-referential processing, and cognitive reappraisal (e.g., medial prefrontal cortex, striatum, and nucleus accumbens) with sustained disorder course. DISCUSSION: The rewarding value of full body images decreases with a sustained disorder course. This may reflect an extension of atypical reward processing documented in AN-WR, perhaps as a function of starvation dampening visceral motivational signals; the deployment of cognitive strategies that lessen the experience of reward; and/or the nature of the stimuli themselves as provocative of eating disorder symptoms (e.g., thin bodies). These findings did not extend to smiling face stimuli. Advances in technology (e.g., virtual avatars, text messaging) may provide novel means to build relationships, including therapeutic relationships, to support improved social connections without threats to symptom provocation.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaCorpus StriatumFacial RecognitionMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexRewardAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30513084
PMCPMC6279022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.