Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30513042›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2019

Recognition Memory in Marmoset and Macaque Monkeys: A Comparison of Active Vision.

Samuel U Nummela, Michael J Jutras, John T Wixted, Elizabeth A Buffalo, Cory T Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Parallel patterns of cognitive aging in marmosets and macaques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel U NummelaUniversity of California, San Diego.
Michael J JutrasUniversity of Washington.
John T WixtedUniversity of California, San Diego.
Elizabeth A BuffaloUniversity of Washington.
Cory T MillerUniversity of California, San Diego.
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Neural basis of vocal signal recognition during natural communicationR01DC012087 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CORY T MILLER · 2012 to 2026
$5.7M
Neural basis of memory in primate medial temporal lobeR01NS109294 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LEUTGEB, JILL K, MILLER, CORY T · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012087NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The core functional organization of the primate brain is remarkably conserved across the order, but behavioral differences evident between species likely reflect derived modifications in the underlying neural processes. Here, we performed the first study to directly compare visual recognition memory in two primate species-rhesus macaques and marmoset monkeys-on the same visual preferential looking task as a first step toward identifying similarities and differences in this cognitive process across the primate phylogeny. Preferences in looking behavior on the task were broadly similar between the species, with greater looking times for novel images compared with repeated images as well as a similarly strong preference for faces compared with other categories. Unexpectedly, we found large behavioral differences among the two species in looking behavior independent of image familiarity. Marmosets exhibited longer looking times, with greater variability compared with macaques, regardless of image content or familiarity. Perhaps most strikingly, marmosets shifted their gaze across the images more quickly, suggesting a different behavioral strategy when viewing images. Although such differences limit the comparison of recognition memory across these closely related species, they point to interesting differences in the mechanisms underlying active vision that have significant implications for future neurobiological investigations with these two nonhuman primate species. Elucidating whether these patterns are reflective of species or broader phylogenetic differences (e.g., between New World and Old World monkeys) necessitates a broader sample of primate taxa from across the Order.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsCallithrixExploratory BehaviorMacaca mulattaSaccadesSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID30513042
PMCPMC6857453
OpenAlexW2903042048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.