ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019
Toward Learned Chemical Perception of Force Field Typing Rules.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Open Force Field Initiative: Open Software and Open Science for Molecular Modeling.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Comprehensive hepatotoxicity prediction: ensemble model integrating machine learning and deep learning.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Regularized by Physics: Graph Neural Network Parametrized Potentials for the Description of Intermolecular Interactions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Chemoinformatics and artificial intelligence colloquium: progress and challenges in developing bioactive compounds.Journal of cheminformatics · 2022Article
- Comparison of the United- and All-Atom Representations of (Halo)alkanes Based on Two Condensed-Phase Force Fields Optimized against the Same Experimental Data Set.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- End-to-end differentiable construction of molecular mechanics force fields.Chemical science · 2022Article
- Recent progress in general force fields of small molecules.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Diverse Scientific Benchmarks for Implicit Membrane Energy Functions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021Article
- Evaluation of nine condensed-phase force fields of the GROMOS, CHARMM, OPLS, AMBER, and OpenFF families against experimental cross-solvation free energies.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2021Article
- Recent progress on cheminformatics approaches to epigenetic drug discovery.Drug discovery today · 2020Review
- Molecular engineering of the last-generation CNTs in smart cancer therapy by grafting PEG-PLGA-riboflavin.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Molecular Perception for Visualization and Computation: The Proxima Library.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020Article
- Data-Driven Mapping of Gas-Phase Quantum Calculations to General Force Field Lennard-Jones Parameters.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2020Article
- Data-driven analysis of the number of Lennard-Jones types needed in a force field.Communications chemistry · 2020Article
- Towards Molecular Simulations that are Transparent, Reproducible, Usable By Others, and Extensible (TRUE).Molecular physics · 2020Article
- Deriving Force-Field Parameters from First Principles Using a Polarizable and Higher Order Dispersion Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
- Comparative Exploratory Analysis of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Dynamics Using Machine Learning and Network Analytic Methods.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
- Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular mechanics force fields define how the energy and forces in a molecular system are computed from its atomic positions, thus enabling the study of such systems through computational methods like molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. Despite progress toward automated force field parametrization, considerable human expertise is required to develop or extend force fields. In particular, human input has long been required to define atom types, which encode chemically unique environments that determine which parameters will be assigned. However, relying on humans to establish atom types is suboptimal. Human-created atom types are often developed without statistical justification, leading to over- or under-fitting of data. Human-created types are also difficult to extend in a systematic and consistent manner when new chemistries must be modeled or new data becomes available. Finally, human effort is not scalable when force fields must be generated for new (bio)polymers, compound classes, or materials. To remedy these deficiencies, our long-term goal is to replace human specification of atom types with an automated approach, based on rigorous statistics and driven by experimental and/or quantum chemical reference data. In this work, we describe novel methods that automate the discovery of appropriate chemical perception: SMARTY allows for the creation of atom types, while SMIRKY goes further by automating the creation of fragment (nonbonded, bonds, angles, and torsions) types. These approaches enable the creation of move sets in atom or fragment type space, which are used within a Monte Carlo optimization approach. We demonstrate the power of these new methods by automating the rediscovery of human defined atom types (SMARTY) or fragment types (SMIRKY) in existing small molecule force fields. We assess these approaches using several molecular data sets, including one which covers a diverse subset of the DrugBank database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.