Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30512036›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2018

Christine M Gault, Karl A Kremling, Edward S Buckler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Between Two Extremes:Plant direct · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine M Gault
Karl A Kremling
Edward S Buckler
Cornell University · USIthaca College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant genomes reduce in size following a whole-genome duplication event, and one gene in a duplicate gene pair can lose function in absence of selective pressure to maintain duplicate gene copies. Maize ( L.) and its sister genus, , share a genome duplication event that occurred 5 to 26 million years ago. Because few genomic resources for exist, it is unknown whether grasses and maize have maintained a similar set of genes that have resisted decay into pseudogenes. Here we present high-quality de novo transcriptome assemblies for two species: (L.) L. and Porter ex Vasey. Genes with experimental protein evidence in maize were good candidates for genes resistant to pseudogenization in both genera because pseudogenes by definition do not produce protein. We tested whether 15,160 maize genes with protein evidence are resisting gene loss and whether their homologs are also resisting gene loss. Protein-encoding maize transcripts and their homologs have higher guanine-cytosine (GC) content, higher gene expression levels, and more conserved expression levels than putatively untranslated maize transcripts and their homologs. These results suggest that similar genes may be decaying into pseudogenes in both genera after a shared ancient polyploidy event. The transcriptome assemblies provide a high-quality genomic resource that can provide insight into the evolution of maize, a highly valuable crop worldwide.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DeletionGenes, PlantPoaceaePolyploidyTranscriptomeZea mays

Identifiers

PMID30512036
PMCPMC12810084
OpenAlexW2950512309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.