Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30512014›Full record

ArticleScientific data2018

An annotated test-retest collection of prostate multiparametric MRI.

Andriy Fedorov, Michael Schwier, David Clunie, Christian Herz, Steve Pieper, Ron Kikinis, Clare Tempany, Fiona Fennessy

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "Why Is There a Tumor?": Tell Me the Reason, Show Me the Evidence.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. National Cancer Institute Imaging Data Commons: Toward Transparency, Reproducibility, and Scalability in Imaging Artificial Intelligence.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Quantitative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andriy FedorovBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4806-9413
Michael SchwierBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
David CluniePixelMed Publishing, Bangor, PA, USA.
Christian HerzBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Steve PieperIsomics Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ron KikinisBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Clare TempanyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Fiona FennessyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PUJOL, SONIA · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
Quantitative Image Informatics for Cancer Research (QIICR)U24CA180918 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FEDOROV, ANDRIY, KIKINIS, RON · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
Quantitiative MRI of prostate cancer as a biomarker and guide for treatmentU01CA151261 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FENNESSY, FIONA · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA151261NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180918NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) is widely used for characterizing prostate cancer. Standard of care use of mpMRI in clinic relies on visual interpretation of the images by an expert. mpMRI is also increasingly used as a quantitative imaging biomarker of the disease. Little is known about repeatability of such quantitative measurements, and no test-retest datasets have been available publicly to support investigation of the technical characteristics of the MRI-based quantification in the prostate. Here we present an mpMRI dataset consisting of baseline and repeat prostate MRI exams for 15 subjects, manually annotated to define regions corresponding to lesions and anatomical structures, and accompanied by region-based measurements. This dataset aims to support further investigation of the repeatability of mpMRI-derived quantitative prostate measurements, study of the robustness and reliability of the automated analysis approaches, and to support development and validation of new image analysis techniques. The manuscript can also serve as an example of the use of DICOM for standardized encoding of the image annotation and quantification results.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID30512014
PMCPMC6278692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.