Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30511450›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2019

Discrepancy between treatment goals documentation by oncologists and their understanding among cancer patients under active treatment with chemotherapy.

Varun Monga, Seth M Maliske, Hassan Kaleem, Sarah L Mott, Gideon K D Zamba, Mohammed Milhem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Varun MongaDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1185-5448
Seth M MaliskeAspirus Wausau Hospital Regional Cancer Center, Wausau, Wisconsin.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4774-806X
Hassan KaleemDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.
Sarah L MottHolden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9381-2080
Gideon K D ZambaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Mohammed MilhemDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-6824
University of Iowa · USRegional Cancer Center · USTexas Tech University · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
University of Iowa Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceU54TR001013 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROSENTHAL, GARY E · 2014 to 2014
$4.2M
CTSA U54TR001013NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001013NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/

backgroundDiscussion of treatment goals between oncologists and patients is challenging. Patients frequently misunderstand goals of therapy. There are several methods to document goals of chemotherapy, however, and are frequently not incorporated into patient charts. METHODS/

designCancer patients receiving their first cycle of chemotherapy were interviewed. Patients' recall of discussions with their oncologist regarding therapy intent was assessed and compared to documentation. An adjusted McNemar's test was utilised. A one-sample proportion test was used to evaluate whether the overall observed rate of discordance was significantly different from the proposed 33% rate; a rate posited as a threshold too high in the clinical sense.

resultsTwo hundred and seven eligible patients were interviewed. Oncologist identified treatment goals were not documented in 24.6% of cases and had to be excluded. There was not a significant difference in the directionality of discordance present. Inter-rater agreement between patient and oncologist was found to be adequate (κ = 0.64). The overall rate of discordance (17.29%) was found to be significantly less than the proposed acceptable level of 33% (p < 0.01). Upon univariable analysis, age, gender, marital and employment status were not found to be associated with discordance.

conclusionsDiscordance between treatment goals documentation and their understanding exists, indicating continued miscommunication between the patient and oncologist.

Indexed as

Patient Care PlanningAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsComprehensionFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsPhysician-Patient RelationsAntineoplastic Agentscancercancer practicechemotherapyrural academicstreatment goals

Identifiers

PMID30511450
PMCPMC6416062
OpenAlexW2903143001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.