ReviewCNS drugs2019
Revisiting the Concept of Subjective Tolerability to Antipsychotic Medications in Schizophrenia and its Clinical and Research Implications: 30 Years Later.
Review in CNS drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of single-administration of D-sorbitol pretreatment on the bitterness and continued willingness to take asenapine: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.BMC psychiatry · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and safety of lurasidone in adolescents and young adults with schizophrenia: A pooled post hoc analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-week studies.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021Trial
- The Effects of Bi-Anodal tDCS Over the Prefrontal Cortex Regions With Extracephalic Reference Placement on Insight Levels and Cardio-Respiratory and Autonomic Functions in Schizophrenia Patients and Exploratory Biomarker Analyses for Treatment Response.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Trial
- Psychological side effects of antipsychotic medication after remission from first-episode psychosis: a HAMLETT ecological momentary assessment study.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Spurious autobiographical memories of psychosis: a dopamine-gated neuroplasticity account for relapse and treatment-resistant psychosis.Psychological medicine · 2025Review
- Connectivity alterations of mesostriatal pathways in first episode psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Relationship between subjective well-being and aripiprazole: an [Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Antipsychotics for negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia: dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled acute phase trials.NPJ schizophrenia · 2021Review
- Comparative Tolerability of Dopamine D2/3 Receptor Partial Agonists for Schizophrenia.CNS drugs · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a long-term psychiatric disorder that impacts important mental functions and requires indefinite treatment, as well as psychosocial and economic support. The introduction of chlorpromazine, the first antipsychotic, and the subsequent development of a long list of similar dopamine-blocking antipsychotic medications, has changed the treatment of schizophrenia as medications have become the cornerstone of clinical management. The enthusiasm that greeted the introduction of antipsychotics was soon tempered by the realisation that they induced significant side effects, such as extrapyramidal and autonomic symptoms. A less-recognized side effect at the time was the emergence of subtle subjective side effects that led patients to dislike medications and eventually discontinue them, with serious consequences of frequent relapses requiring hospitalization, poor outcomes and more health costs. The development of our dedicated programme for research into subjective tolerability to medications over the past 30 years has allowed us to establish the validity of the construct of 'subjective tolerability' to antipsychotics, applying research methodologies that are required for any scientific inquiry. We clarified definitions, developed reliable measuring tools, and constructed psychosocial and neurobiological conceptual models. We also documented the serious consequences of negative subjective tolerability to antipsychotics: poor medication adherence behaviour, impaired quality of life, and worse clinical and functional outcomes. More recently, using neuroimaging techniques, we and other international research groups were able to clearly elucidate the neurobiology of dysphoric negative subjective responses, linking it to low dopamine functioning in the striatal region of the brain. Such a discovery for the first time allowed us to also link the development of comorbid drug abuse in schizophrenia, which is a common occurrence, to the development of neuroleptic dysphoria, since both relate to the low dopamine function in the striatum. As an already validated scientific concept that has serious consequences, subjective tolerability to antipsychotics can serve as a model for patient-centered outcomes that really matter. Our long-serving research programme also illustrates the value of clinical observations to the development of important clinical research studies, i.e. from the bedside to the research bench, and back to the bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.