ArticlePsychometrika2019
Variable-Length Stopping Rules for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Article in Psychometrika, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does the Mode of PROM Administration Affect the Responses of Hospitalized Patients?Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Trial
- Initial Development of a Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test for Intensive Longitudinal Assessment of Suicide Risk: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Efficiency of PROMIS MCAT Assessments for Orthopaedic Care.Measurement : interdisciplinary research and perspectives · 2025Article
- Detecting uniform differential item functioning for continuous response computerized adaptive testing.Applied psychological measurement · 2024Article
- Termination Criteria for Grid Multiclassification Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Polytomous Items.Applied psychological measurement · 2022Article
- Robustness of Adaptive Measurement of Change to Item Parameter Estimation Error.Educational and psychological measurement · 2022Article
- Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Potential Path Toward the Efficient and Precise Assessment of Applied Cognition, Daily Activity, and Mobility for Hospitalized Patients.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Can Proxy Ratings Supplement Patient Report to Assess Functional Domains Among Hospitalized Patients?Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- LASSO-Based Pattern Recognition for Replenished Items With Graded Responses in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Improving the Delivery of Function-Directed Care During Acute Hospitalizations: Methods to Develop and Validate the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test (FAMCAT).Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021Article
- Making Fixed-Precision Between-Item Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Tests Even Shorter by Reducing the Asymmetry Between Selection and Stopping Rules.Applied psychological measurement · 2020Article
- A LASSO-Based Method for Detecting Item-Trait Patterns of Replenished Items in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Hypothesis Testing Methods for Multivariate Multi-Occasion Intra-Individual Change.Multivariate behavioral researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In computerized adaptive testing (CAT), a variable-length stopping rule refers to ending item administration after a pre-specified measurement precision standard has been satisfied. The goal is to provide equal measurement precision for all examinees regardless of their true latent trait level. Several stopping rules have been proposed in unidimensional CAT, such as the minimum information rule or the maximum standard error rule. These rules have also been extended to multidimensional CAT and cognitive diagnostic CAT, and they all share the same idea of monitoring measurement error. Recently, Babcock and Weiss (J Comput Adapt Test 2012. https://doi.org/10.7333/1212-0101001) proposed an "absolute change in theta" (CT) rule, which is useful when an item bank is exhaustive of good items for one or more ranges of the trait continuum. Choi, Grady and Dodd (Educ Psychol Meas 70:1-17, 2010) also argued that a CAT should stop when the standard error does not change, implying that the item bank is likely exhausted. Although these stopping rules have been evaluated and compared in different simulation studies, the relationships among the various rules remain unclear, and therefore there lacks a clear guideline regarding when to use which rule. This paper presents analytic results to show the connections among various stopping rules within both unidimensional and multidimensional CAT. In particular, it is argued that the CT-rule alone can be unstable and it can end the test prematurely. However, the CT-rule can be a useful secondary rule to monitor the point of diminished returns. To further provide empirical evidence, three simulation studies are reported using both the 2PL model and the multidimensional graded response model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30511327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.