Observational studySurgical endoscopy2019
Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) for benign colon polyps: a single institution cost analysis.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery versus laparoscopic segmental resection for the treatment of endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary team-guided combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery for complex colonic lesions: a single-center retrospective cohort study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- The Outcome of Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resections (CAL-WR) for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Creating the Future of (Endoluminal) GI Interventions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Barriers to Implementation of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Colonoscopy-Assisted Laparoscopic Wedge Resection for the Treatment of Suspected T1 Colon Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Combined endoscopic robotic surgery for complex colonic polyp resection: case series.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) can avoid segmental colectomy in endoscopically unremovable colonic polyps: a cohort study over 10 years.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Observational
- Evaluation of a progressive algorithmic approach for the treatment of unresectable colon polyps using colon conservation techniques.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Review
- Combined Endoscopic-Robotic Resection of a Giant Polyp to Avoid Colorectal Resection.CRSLS : MIS case reports from SLSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic removal of benign colon polyps is not always possible, even with advanced endoscopic techniques. Segmental colectomy has been the traditional therapy but is associated with an increased risk of complications and may be unnecessary since fewer than 20% of these polyps harbor malignancy. Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) has emerged as an alternative method to address these polyps. While feasibility, safety, and improved short-term patient outcomes have been demonstrated, there has never been an evaluation of cost comparing these two approaches within a single institution.
methodsIn this observational cohort study, we compared short-term outcomes and costs of 11 patients who underwent CELS for right colon polyps with 11 patients who underwent a laparoscopic right colectomy between April 2014 and November 2017. The cost analysis covered the perioperative period from operating room to hospital discharge.
resultsA total of 11 patients underwent an attempted CELS procedure for right colon polyps with a success rate of 90% (10/11). The median length of stay (LOS) for CELS patients was 1 day. LOS for patients who underwent a laparoscopic right colectomy at TMC was 3.82 days. The median OR time for CELS was 166.73 (± 57.88) min, compared to 204.73 (± 51.49) min for a laparoscopic right colectomy. The calculated total cost for a CELS patient was $5523.29, compared to $12,626.33 for a laparoscopic right colectomy, for a cost-savings of $7103.04 per patient.
conclusionsCELS procedures are associated with good short-term outcomes and are performed at a lower cost compared to traditional laparoscopic colectomy, with the most significant cost saver being shorter hospital LOS. This is the first study to directly compare the cost of CELS to traditional laparoscopic colectomy in the surgical management of benign colon polyps within a single institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.