Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30511309›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2019

Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) for benign colon polyps: a single institution cost analysis.

Anusha Jayaram, Nathan Barr, Robert Plummer, Mengdi Yao, Lilian Chen, James Yoo

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Creating the Future of (Endoluminal) GI Interventions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  5. Barriers to Implementation of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anusha JayaramDepartment of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, #6190, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Nathan BarrBoston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Robert PlummerDepartment of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, #6190, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Mengdi YaoDepartment of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, #6190, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Lilian ChenDepartment of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, #6190, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
James YooDepartment of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, #6190, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. jyoo@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0639-3944
Tufts University · USBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic removal of benign colon polyps is not always possible, even with advanced endoscopic techniques. Segmental colectomy has been the traditional therapy but is associated with an increased risk of complications and may be unnecessary since fewer than 20% of these polyps harbor malignancy. Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) has emerged as an alternative method to address these polyps. While feasibility, safety, and improved short-term patient outcomes have been demonstrated, there has never been an evaluation of cost comparing these two approaches within a single institution.

methodsIn this observational cohort study, we compared short-term outcomes and costs of 11 patients who underwent CELS for right colon polyps with 11 patients who underwent a laparoscopic right colectomy between April 2014 and November 2017. The cost analysis covered the perioperative period from operating room to hospital discharge.

resultsA total of 11 patients underwent an attempted CELS procedure for right colon polyps with a success rate of 90% (10/11). The median length of stay (LOS) for CELS patients was 1 day. LOS for patients who underwent a laparoscopic right colectomy at TMC was 3.82 days. The median OR time for CELS was 166.73 (± 57.88) min, compared to 204.73 (± 51.49) min for a laparoscopic right colectomy. The calculated total cost for a CELS patient was $5523.29, compared to $12,626.33 for a laparoscopic right colectomy, for a cost-savings of $7103.04 per patient.

conclusionsCELS procedures are associated with good short-term outcomes and are performed at a lower cost compared to traditional laparoscopic colectomy, with the most significant cost saver being shorter hospital LOS. This is the first study to directly compare the cost of CELS to traditional laparoscopic colectomy in the surgical management of benign colon polyps within a single institution.

Indexed as

ColectomyColonColonic PolypsColonoscopyCost SavingsFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedColon polypCombined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS)Cost analysis

Identifiers

PMID30511309
OpenAlexW2902396017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.