ArticleObesity surgery2019
Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Screening Preoperatively with the Epworth Questionnaire: Is It Worth It…?
Article in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Peri- and Postoperative Outcomes for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Patients after Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obesity surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Unforeseen pathological and anatomical findings during primary metabolic and bariatric surgery - a retrospective cohort study and review of the literature.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- "Leaky Gut" as a Keystone of the Connection between Depression and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome? A Rationale and Study Design.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Bariatric Surgery Candidates.Nature and science of sleep · 2021Article
- Validation of the GOAL Questionnaire as an Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Instrument in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: a Brazilian Single-Center Study.Obesity surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in the bariatric population has been reported to be as high as 60-83%. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a validated, self-administrated eight-item questionnaire that measures subjective daytime sleepiness and thus helps to identify high-risk for OSA.
objectivesTo find the prevalence of OSA in patients undergoing bariatric surgery who do not routinely undergo polysomnography (PSG) and are screened by the ESS.
methodsAll consecutive 425 patients who underwent bariatric surgery in our tercier referral centre from January 2012 to June 2017 were included in this prospective study. Patient demographics and ESS score were recorded prior to the bariatric surgery and patients were divided into low-risk (ESS < 11), high-risk (≥ 11) and "known-OSA" groups.
resultsThe community-based OSA prevalence was 14% (59 patients). ESS-positive predictive value was 60%. There was no significant difference in BMI and excess body-weight, but patients with OSA were older and had a lower female ratio (75% vs 42%). The unplanned ICU admission rate was comparable amongst the low- and high-ESS group (2.2% and 2.1%, respectively); similarly, the respiratory and chest complication rate were similar. The median hospital stay for patients diagnosed with OSA was a half day longer; the high-score patients stayed significantly longer than the low-score patients (p = 0.017).
conclusionIn our study, the OSA prevalence was low (20%). We think that the ESS does not have significant predicting value before bariatric surgery and overall the OSA is "overhyped" in the bariatric pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30511307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.