ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2019
Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissociating task, semantic, and response conflict in cognitive aging: evidence from a low-cognitive control Stroop paradigm.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Coupling between statistical learning and interference suppression.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Adaptive behavior is guided by integrated representations of controlled and non-controlled information.eLife · 2026Article
- The asymmetric list shift effect - flexible adaptation to new context demands?Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- The effects of intelligibility on conflict resolution and monitoring during speech recognition in noise.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Proactive Control of Emotional Information in Adult ADHD.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
- Response Preparation and the Simon Effect: Experimental and Model-Based Analyses.Journal of cognition · 2026Article
- Adaptive behavior is guided by integrated representations of controlled and non-controlled information.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Age-related differences in information, but not task control in the color-word Stroop task.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Article
- Dynamic modulation of spatial selection: Online and anticipatory adjustments in the flanker task.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Lateral prefrontal theta oscillations causally drive a computational mechanism underlying conflict expectation and adaptation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Investigating Sensitivity to Auditory Cognition in Listening Effort Assessments: A Simultaneous EEG and Pupillometry Study.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Evidence for conflict monitoring during speech recognition in noise.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Proactive response preparation contributes to contingency learning: novel evidence from force-sensitive keyboards.Psychological research · 2024Article
- A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Humans reconfigure target and distractor processing to address distinct task demands.Psychological review · 2024Article
- Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.Psychological research · 2024Review
- Conflict detection and resolution in macaque frontal eye fields.Communications biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most influential ideas in recent decades in the cognitive psychology literature is conflict monitoring theory. According to this account, each time we experience a conflict (e.g., between a colour word and print colour in the Stroop task), attentional control is upregulated to minimize distraction on subsequent trials. Though influential, evidence purported to support this theoretical model (primarily, proportion congruent and congruency sequence effects) has been frequently criticized. Furious debate has centered on whether or not conflict monitoring does or does not occur and, if so, under which conditions. The present article presents an updated review of this debate. In particular, the article considers new research that either (a) seems particularly damaging for the conflict monitoring view or (b) seems to provide support for the theory. The author argues that new findings of the latter sort are still not compelling, several of which have already-demonstrated confounds and others which are plausibly confounded. Further progress has, to a greater extent than not, provided even stronger support for the position that conflict monitoring is merely an illusion. Instead, the net results can be more coherently understood in terms of (relatively) simpler learning/memory biases unrelated to conflict or attention that confound the key paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30511233What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.