Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30511229›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2019

Validity and interpretability of the QuickDASH in the assessment of hand disability in rheumatoid arthritis.

Fausto Salaffi, Marco Di Carlo, Marina Carotti, Sonia Farah

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fausto SalaffiRheumatological Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Aldo Moro, 25, Jesi, 60035, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-6831
Marco Di CarloRheumatological Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Aldo Moro, 25, Jesi, 60035, Ancona, Italy. dica.marco@yahoo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0906-4647
Marina CarottiDepartment of Radiology, Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6562-180X
Sonia FarahRheumatological Clinic, Ospedale "Carlo Urbani", Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Aldo Moro, 25, Jesi, 60035, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9815-2621
Marche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective of this study is to evaluate the construct validity and the interpretability of the shortened Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) hand disability. Consecutive RA patients were assessed through the QuickDASH and other function and disease activity indices, respectively, the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire (ROAD). For each patient were evaluated the tender and swollen 28-joints counts. Interpretability was defined determining cut-off points of impairment in accordance to the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) definition of disease activity states. A total of 440 patients (89 men and 351 women, mean age of 57.0 ± 12.7 years) were enrolled. Following the SDAI definition, 98 patients (22.3%) resulted in REM, 115 subjects (26.1%) in LDA, 74 patients (16.8%) in MDA, and 153 subjects (34.8%) in HDA. Mean QuickDASH differed significantly between patients classified as remission (REM), low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA), or high disease activity (HDA) (p < 0.001). High correlations were found comparing QuickDASH to composite indices of disease activity and of physical health function: of special interest are the correlations between the comparable dimension of the QuickDASH and the ROAD Upper Extremity Function (rho = 0.876; p < 0.001). The cut-off points for functional categories (SDAI categories as external criterion) resulted: no impairment ≤ 13, 13 < low impairment ≤ 18.5, 18.5 < moderate impairment ≤ 31.5, and high impairment > 31.5. QuickDASH is useful in clinical practice, for its ease of administration, and positively correlates with the disease activity. It may be a surrogate for evaluating upper extremity impairment, disability index and disease control in RA patients.

Indexed as

Physical Functional PerformanceAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHand JointsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesDisease activityHand disabilityPatient-reported outcomesQuickDASHRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID30511229
OpenAlexW2903549389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.