ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019
Do Stage I Colorectal Cancers with Lymphatic Invasion Require a Different Postoperative Approach?
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer after curative resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Vertical margin distance in T1 colorectal carcinoma resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection affects prognosis after additional surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Analysis of risk factors for postoperative recurrence of stage I colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis of a large population.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2023Article
- Review
- Perineural invasion and number of retrieved lymph nodes are prognostic factors for T2N0 colon cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough stage I colorectal cancer has an excellent prognosis after complete surgical resection, disease recurrence still occurs. This study aimed to assess prognostic risk factors in this early stage of disease.
methodsAll non-neoadjuvantly treated stage I colon (CC) and rectal (RC) patients who underwent a surgical resection between 2004 and 2015 were identified. Clinicopathological differences and long-term oncological outcomes were compared.
resultsCC patients (n = 433) were older and had more pre-existing comorbidities. RC patients (n = 86) were associated with more T2 tumors, venous invasion, and higher rates of 30-day morbidity. In multivariate analysis, lymphatic invasion was found to be an independent predictor for disease recurrence (OR 4.57, P = 0.010) and worse disease-free survival (HR 4.26, P = 0.012). This was particularly true for distant recurrence, with eight times higher hazard ratios when lymphatic invasion was present (HR 8.02, P < 0.001). T2 tumors were at risk, though no significant association was found (OR 3.86, P = 0.051; HR 3.61, P = 0.065, respectively).
conclusionsLymphatic invasion was strongly associated with worse DFS, in particular distant recurrence. This subgroup of stage I patients might benefit from a more intensive follow-up and maybe should be considered for adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30511134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.