Trial reportPathology oncology research : POR2019
Combined Treatment with Autologous CIK Cells, Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Trial report in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical application of cytokine-induced killer cells in cancer immunotherapy.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Advances in immunotherapy for HPV-associated malignancies: emerging strategies and clinical progress.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy in cervical cancer: an innovative approach for better treatment outcomes.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- Adoptive cell therapy against tumor immune evasion: mechanisms, innovations, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- NK and cells with NK-like activities in cancer immunotherapy-clinical perspectives.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy for Cervical Cancer-A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.Cancers · 2022Review
- Cervical Cancer Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Review
- Effects of interleukin-2 concentration and administration method on proliferation and function of cytokine-induced killer cells.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Intravenous Endostar Treatment Combined With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- From the Infection to the Immunotherapy in Cervical Cancer: Can We Stop the Natural Course of the Disease?Vaccines · 2020Review
- Inhibiting ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 N by microRNA-590-3p reduced cell growth of cervical carcinoma.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Cervical Cancer: Emerging Immune Landscape and Treatment.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Review
- A comparative analysis of high-flux and low-flux dialysis in cervical cancer patients with obstructive renal failure showing no significantly improved renal function after catheterisation.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the clinical efficacy of autologous cytokine induced killer (CIK) cells transfusion combined with radiochemotherapy in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. A total of 89 hospitalized patients with advanced cervical cancer were admitted and divided into the treatment group (44 cases, autologous CIK cells transfusion combined with radiochemotherapy) and the control group (45 cases, radiochemotherapy) by a randomized non-blind method. Comparisons of therapeutic efficacies, immune functions, life qualities and survival rates were analyzed between the two groups. The short-term therapeutic efficacy of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group. There was no significant difference in 1, 2 and 3 year survival rates between the two groups. Compared with pre-treatment, levels of CD3
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.