Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30511044›Full record

ArticleBJS open2018

Comparison of guidelines for the management of rectal cancer.

E Luzietti, G Pellino, S Nikolaou, S Qiu, S Mills, O Warren, P Tekkis, C Kontovounisios

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer: A nationwide cohort study from the Netherlands.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Management of rectal cancer in Canada: an evidence-based comparison of clinical practice guidelinesCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E LuziettiDepartment of Surgical Sciences Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Parma Parma Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-1137
G PellinoDepartment of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences Universtià della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli' Naples Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-6421
S NikolaouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery Royal Marsden Hospital London UK.
S QiuDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-4621
S MillsDepartment of Colorectal Surgery Chelsea and Westminster Hospital London UK.
O WarrenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery Chelsea and Westminster Hospital London UK.
P TekkisDepartment of Colorectal Surgery Royal Marsden Hospital London UK.
C KontovounisiosDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Imperial College London London UK.
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBOspedale di Parma · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparison between NCCN, ESMO and JSCCR Guidelines is presented, concerning the treatment of rectal cancer, with an analysis and discussion of their discrepancies. Differences indicate areas for research.

Identifiers

PMID30511044
PMCPMC6254003
OpenAlexW2884940304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.