Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30510605›Full record

ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2018

Sonographic Indicators for Treatment Choice and Follow-Up in Patients with Pleural Effusion.

Ruza Stevic, Nikola Colic, Slavisa Bascarevic, Marko Kostic, Dejan Moskovljevic, Milan Savic, Maja Ercegovac

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruza StevicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-3663
Nikola ColicCenter for Radiology and MRI, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Slavisa BascarevicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Marko KosticClinic for Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dejan MoskovljevicClinic for Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan SavicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Maja ErcegovacFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSCentar za Promociju Nauke · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of thoracic sonography in treatment of pleural effusions and to identify sonographic indicators for surgical intervention. Materials and Methods: This study included 378 patients with pleural effusions. US characteristics of effusions as the echo structure and pleural thickening were analyzed. Regarding the US finding, the diagnostic or therapeutic procedure was performed. Results: The study included 267 male and 111 female patients, an average of 56.7 years. Infection was the most frequent cause of effusion. Two hundred sixty-nine patients had loculated and 109 free pleural effusion. Most frequent echo structure of loculated effusion was complex septate, whereas free effusion was mostly anechoic. Successful obtaining of the pleural fluid without real-time guidance was in 88% and under real-time guidance in 99% patients ( Conclusion: Thoracic sonography is a very useful tool in the evaluation of clinical course and treatment options in patients with pleural effusions of a different origin.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overDiaphragmDrainageFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPleuraPleural EffusionThoracentesisThoracotomyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30510605
PMCPMC6232814
OpenAlexW2898707922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.