Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30510592›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2018

Biomechanical Aspects of Closing Approaches in Postcarotid Endarterectomy.

Idit Avrahami, Dafna Raz, Oranit Bash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Idit AvrahamiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4927-3491
Dafna RazDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Oranit BashDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The carotid bifurcation tends to develop atherosclerotic stenoses which might interfere with cerebral blood supply. In cases of arterial blockage, the common clinical solution is to remove the plaque via carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery. Artery closure after surgery using primary closures along the cutting edge might lead to artery narrowing and restrict blood flow. An alternative approach is patch angioplasty which takes longer time and leads to more during-surgery complications. The present study uses numerical methods with fluid-structure interaction (FSI) to explore and compare the two solutions in terms of hemodynamics and stress and strain fields developed in the artery wall.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAngioplastyBiomechanical PhenomenaCarotid Artery DiseasesCarotid SinusComputer SimulationEndarterectomy, CarotidHemodynamicsHumansMathematical ConceptsSuture TechniquesVascular Closure DevicesWound Closure Techniques

Identifiers

PMID30510592
PMCPMC6230422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.