Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30510365›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2018

A comparative study of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: Short-term operative outcomes at a high-volume center.

Won Ho Han, Amir Ben Yehuda, Deok-Hee Kim, Seung Geun Yang, Bang Wool Eom, Hong Man Yoon, Young-Woo Kim, Keun Won Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Won Ho HanCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 410-769, Republic of Korea.
Amir Ben YehudaDepartment of Surgery, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin 70300, Israel.
Deok-Hee KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 410-769, Republic of Korea.
Seung Geun YangCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 410-769, Republic of Korea.
Bang Wool EomCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 410-769, Republic of Korea.
Hong Man YoonCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 410-769, Republic of Korea.
Young-Woo KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 410-769, Republic of Korea.
Keun Won RyuCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 410-769, Republic of Korea.
Assaf Harofeh Medical Center · ILNational Cancer Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaparoscopic gastrectomy has been established as a standard treatment for early gastric cancer, and its use is increasing recently. Compared with the conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG), totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) involves intracorporeal reconstruction, which can avoid the additional incision, resulting in pain reduction and early recovery. This study aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of TLDG

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1,322 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy from June 2012 to June 2017 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. LADG was performed in the early period before July 2015, and TLDG was applied in the later period. Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared in terms of complication and clinical course between the two groups. Pain score was measured by rating the pain intensity from 0 to 10 points on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3.

resultsA total of 667 patients underwent LADG and 655 patients underwent TLDG. Clinicopathologic characteristics were not different in both groups. Intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL) was significantly lower in the TLDG group (P<0.001). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the TLDG group than in the LADG group on POD 1 (5.1±1.5

conclusionsBased on the reported short-term postoperative outcomes, TLDG is safe and feasible as well as LADG. Moreover, compared with LADG, TLDG can reduce intraoperative EBL and postoperative pain and enhance the bowel motility in gastric cancer surgery.

Indexed as

Distal gastrectomygastric cancerintracorporeal anastomosislaparoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30510365
PMCPMC6232361
OpenAlexW2900125994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.