Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30510348›Full record

ArticleWorld development2018

Revisiting the patriarchal bargain: The intergenerational power dynamics of household money management in rural Nepal.

Lu Gram, Jolene Skordis-Worrall, Jenevieve Mannell, Dharma S Manandhar, Naomi Saville, Joanna Morrison

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Traditional Beliefs, Practices, and Migration: A Risk to Malaria Transmission in Rural Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lu GramInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Jolene Skordis-WorrallInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Jenevieve MannellInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Dharma S ManandharInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Naomi SavilleInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
Joanna MorrisonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBGeorge Institute for Global Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although power struggles between daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law in the South Asian household remain an enduring theme of feminist scholarship, current policy discourse on 'women's economic empowerment' in the Global South tends to focus on married women's power over their husband; this neglects intergenerational power dynamics. The aim of this study was to describe and analyze the processes involved in young, married women's negotiations of control over cash inside the extended household in a contemporary rural Nepali setting. We conducted a grounded theory study of 42 households from the Plains of Nepal. Our study uncovered multiple ways in which junior wives and husbands in the extended household became secret allies in seeking financial autonomy from the rule of the mother-in-law to the wife. This included secretly saving up for a household separation from the in-laws. We argue these secret financial strategies constitute a means for junior couples to renegotiate the terms of Kandiyoti's (1988) 'patriarchal bargain' wherein junior wives traditionally had to accept subservience to their husband and mother-in-law in exchange for economic security and eventual authority over their own daughters-in-law. Researchers, activists and policy-makers concerned with women's economic empowerment in comparable contexts should consider the impact of intergenerational power relations on women's control over cash.

Indexed as

AgencyEmpowermentHousehold financesIntergenerational relationsMoney managementPower

Identifiers

PMID30510348
PMCPMC6167740
OpenAlexW2888341921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.