Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30510282›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Developmental pattern and structural factors of dendritic survival in cerebellar granule cells in vivo.

Matasha Dhar, Adam W Hantman, Hiroshi Nishiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matasha DharCenter for Learning and Memory, Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station Stop, C7000, Austin, Texas, USA.
Adam W HantmanJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.
Hiroshi NishiyamaCenter for Learning and Memory, Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station Stop, C7000, Austin, Texas, USA. hiroshi@utexas.edu.

Funding

CNS mechanisms of developmental synapse eliminationR01NS073919 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI NISHIYAMA, HIROSHI · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granule cells (GCs) in the cerebellar cortex are important for sparse encoding of afferent sensorimotor information. Modeling studies show that GCs can perform their function most effectively when they have four dendrites. Indeed, mature GCs have four short dendrites on average, each terminating in a claw-like ending that receives both excitatory and inhibitory inputs. Immature GCs, however, have significantly more dendrites-all without claws. How these redundant dendrites are refined during development is largely unclear. Here, we used in vivo time-lapse imaging and immunohistochemistry to study developmental refinement of GC dendritic arbors and its relation to synapse formation. We found that while the formation of dendritic claws stabilized the dendrites, the selection of surviving dendrites was made before claw formation, and longer immature dendrites had a significantly higher chance of survival than shorter dendrites. Using immunohistochemistry, we show that glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses are transiently formed on immature GC dendrites, and the number of GABAergic, but not glutamatergic, synapses correlates with the length of immature dendrites. Together, these results suggest a potential role of transient GABAergic synapses on dendritic selection and show that preselected dendrites are stabilized by the formation of dendritic claws-the site of mature synapses.

Indexed as

AnimalsCerebellar CortexDendritesGABAergic NeuronsMiceSynapses

Identifiers

PMID30510282
PMCPMC6277421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.