Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30510280›Full record

ArticleNature nanotechnology2019

Nanoscale tweezers for single-cell biopsies.

Binoy Paulose Nadappuram, Paolo Cadinu, Avijit Barik, Alexander J Ainscough, Michael J Devine, Minkyung Kang, Jorge Gonzalez-Garcia, Josef T Kittler, Keith R Willison, Ramon Vilar and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Programmable electric tweezers.Science advances · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Exploring the Frontiers of Cell Temperature Measurement and Thermogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microtubule-Mediated Regulation of βCirculation research · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent advances in single-cell subcellular sampling.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. A subcellular cookie cutter for spatial genomics in human tissue.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Binoy Paulose NadappuramDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paolo CadinuDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-0222
Avijit BarikDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alexander J AinscoughDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michael J DevineDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6076-3382
Minkyung KangDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jorge Gonzalez-GarciaDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Josef T KittlerDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3437-9456
Keith R WillisonDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ramon VilarDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paolo ActisSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Pollard Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-1854
Beata Wojciak-StothardDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sang-Hyun OhDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Aleksandar P IvanovDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK. alex.ivanov@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-1381
Joshua B EdelDepartment of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London, UK. joshua.edel@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-8659
Imperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the functionality of multicellular systems arises from the spatial organization and dynamic behaviours within and between cells. Current single-cell genomic methods only provide a transcriptional 'snapshot' of individual cells. The real-time analysis and perturbation of living cells would generate a step change in single-cell analysis. Here we describe minimally invasive nanotweezers that can be spatially controlled to extract samples from living cells with single-molecule precision. They consist of two closely spaced electrodes with gaps as small as 10-20 nm, which can be used for the dielectrophoretic trapping of DNA and proteins. Aside from trapping single molecules, we also extract nucleic acids for gene expression analysis from living cells without affecting their viability. Finally, we report on the trapping and extraction of a single mitochondrion. This work bridges the gap between single-molecule/organelle manipulation and cell biology and can ultimately enable a better understanding of living cells.

Indexed as

NanotechnologyOptical TweezersSingle-Cell AnalysisAnimalsAxonsBiopsyCell Line, TumorCell NucleusDNAElectricityElectrodesFluorescenceHumansMiceMitochondriaRNA, MessengerDNARNA, MessengerSolutions

Identifiers

PMID30510280
OpenAlexW2900774960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.