Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30510260›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Honey bee Royalactin unlocks conserved pluripotency pathway in mammals.

Derrick C Wan, Stefanie L Morgan, Andrew L Spencley, Natasha Mariano, Erin Y Chang, Gautam Shankar, Yunhai Luo, Ted H Li, Dana Huh, Star K Huynh and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Royal Jelly: Biological Action and Health Benefits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Theranostics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Derrick C WanDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Stefanie L MorganDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Andrew L SpencleyDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Natasha MarianoDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Erin Y ChangDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Gautam ShankarDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Yunhai LuoDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Ted H LiDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Dana HuhDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Star K HuynhDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Jasmine M GarciaDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Cole M DoveyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Jennifer LumbDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Ling LiuThe Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Katharine V BrownDepartment of Developmental Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Abel BermudezCanary Center for Cancer Early Detection, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Richard LuongDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Hong ZengInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Victoria L MascettiInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Sharon J PitteriCanary Center for Cancer Early Detection, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-873X
Jordon WangLakePharma, Inc., Belmont, CA, 94002, USA.
Hua TuLakePharma, Inc., Belmont, CA, 94002, USA.
Marco QuartaThe Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Vittorio SebastianoInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Roel NusseDepartment of Developmental Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Thomas A RandoThe Glenn Laboratories for the Biology of Aging and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Jan E CaretteDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
J Fernando BazanR&D Systems, Inc, Minneapolis, MN, 55413, USA.
Kevin C WangDepartment of Dermatology, Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. kevwang@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5305-6791

Funding

Wnt signaling in muscle stem cell agingP01AG036695 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI THOMAS A. RANDO · 2011 to 2026
$29.3M
Notch Signaling and Satellite Cell ActivationR37AG023806 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RANDO, THOMAS A. · 2010 to 2019
$2.9M
Defining BMP-responsive lncRNA for bone regenerationK08DE024269 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WAN, DERRICK · 2014 to 2018
$632k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG036695NIA NIH HHS R37 AG023806NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE024269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Royal jelly is the queen-maker for the honey bee Apis mellifera, and has cross-species effects on longevity, fertility, and regeneration in mammals. Despite this knowledge, how royal jelly or its components exert their myriad effects has remained poorly understood. Using mouse embryonic stem cells as a platform, here we report that through its major protein component Royalactin, royal jelly can maintain pluripotency by activating a ground-state pluripotency-like gene network. We further identify Regina, a mammalian structural analog of Royalactin that also induces a naive-like state in mouse embryonic stem cells. This reveals an important innate program for stem cell self-renewal with broad implications in understanding the molecular regulation of stem cell fate across species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesChromatinFatty AcidsFemaleFertilityGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGlycoproteinsInsect ProteinsLentivirusLongevityMammalsMiceModels, MolecularMouse Embryonic Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsChromatinFatty AcidsGlycoproteinsInsect ProteinsMRJP1 protein, Apis melliferaRecombinant ProteinsRoyal JellyUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID30510260
PMCPMC6277453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.