Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509998›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Predicting plant conservation priorities on a global scale.

Tara A Pelletier, Bryan C Carstens, David C Tank, Jack Sullivan, Anahí Espíndola

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Using comparative extinction risk analysis to prioritize the IUCN Red List reassessments of amphibians.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting undetected native vascular plant diversity at a global scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. WASP: the World Archives of Species Perception.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  10. Evidence-based guidelines for automated conservation assessments of plant species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Analysis of biodiversity data suggests that mammal species are hidden in predictable places.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prioritizing actions: spatial action maps for conservation.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tara A PelletierDepartment of Biology, Radford University, Radford, VA 24142.
Bryan C CarstensDepartment of Evolution, Ecology & Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
David C TankInstitute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3051.
Jack SullivanInstitute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3051.
Anahí EspíndolaDepartment of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4454 anahiesp@umd.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-8836
University of Idaho · USRadford University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

UNDERGRADUATE COLLEGE OUTREACH PROGRAMP20RR016454 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI CHASE, JENNIFER R · 2001 to 2011
$35.3M
The Evolution of Protein FlexibilityP20RR016448 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI ROBISON, BARRIE D · 2002 to 2011
$19.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016448NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conservation status of most plant species is currently unknown, despite the fundamental role of plants in ecosystem health. To facilitate the costly process of conservation assessment, we developed a predictive protocol using a machine-learning approach to predict conservation status of over 150,000 land plant species. Our study uses open-source geographic, environmental, and morphological trait data, making this the largest assessment of conservation risk to date and the only global assessment for plants. Our results indicate that a large number of unassessed species are likely at risk and identify several geographic regions with the highest need of conservation efforts, many of which are not currently recognized as regions of global concern. By providing conservation-relevant predictions at multiple spatial and taxonomic scales, predictive frameworks such as the one developed here fill a pressing need for biodiversity science.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEndangered SpeciesPlantsGeographic MappingPopulation DynamicsconservationIUCNplantaepredictive modelingrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID30509998
PMCPMC6304935
OpenAlexW2902964238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.