Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509988›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Noninvasive diagnostic imaging using machine-learning analysis of nanoresolution images of cell surfaces: Detection of bladder cancer.

I Sokolov, M E Dokukin, V Kalaparthi, M Miljkovic, A Wang, J D Seigne, P Grivas, E Demidenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. High-Throughput Nanorheology of Living Cells Powered by Supervised Machine Learning.Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Applications of artificial intelligence in urologic oncology.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Quick Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

I SokolovDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155; igor.sokolov@tufts.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6260-4326
M E DokukinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
V KalaparthiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
M MiljkovicDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
A WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
J D SeigneDivision of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH 03756.
P GrivasDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105.
E DemidenkoBiomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH 03756.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report an approach in diagnostic imaging based on nanoscale-resolution scanning of surfaces of cells collected from body fluids using a recent modality of atomic force microscopy (AFM), subresonance tapping, and machine-leaning analysis. The surface parameters, which are typically used in engineering to describe surfaces, are used to classify cells. The method is applied to the detection of bladder cancer, which is one of the most common human malignancies and the most expensive cancer to treat. The frequent visual examinations of bladder (cytoscopy) required for follow-up are not only uncomfortable for the patient but a serious cost for the health care system. Our method addresses an unmet need in noninvasive and accurate detection of bladder cancer, which may eliminate unnecessary and expensive cystoscopies. The method, which evaluates cells collected from urine, shows 94% diagnostic accuracy when examining five cells per patient's urine sample. It is a statistically significant improvement (

Indexed as

HumansMachine LearningMicroscopy, Atomic ForceSensitivity and SpecificityUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrineatomic force microscopycancer diagnosticsdiagnostic imagingmachine learningnoninvasive methods

Identifiers

PMID30509988
PMCPMC6304950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.