Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509984›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

A neural data structure for novelty detection.

Sanjoy Dasgupta, Timothy C Sheehan, Charles F Stevens, Saket Navlakha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Bloom filters for molecules.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023
    Article
  9. Distributed algorithms from arboreal ants for the shortest path problem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. A neural theory for counting memories.Nature communications · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Learning probabilistic neural representations with randomly connected circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Habituation as a neural algorithm for online odor discrimination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Neural Circuit Dynamics for Sensory Detection.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanjoy DasguptaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Timothy C SheehanNeurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Charles F StevensKavli Institute for Brain & Mind, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; navlakha@salk.edu stevens@salk.edu.
Saket NavlakhaIntegrative Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037 navlakha@salk.edu stevens@salk.edu.

Funding

CRCNS: Common algorithmic strategies used by the brain for labeling points in high-dimensional spaceR01DC017695 · NIDCD · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI NAVLAKHA, SAKET · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novelty detection is a fundamental biological problem that organisms must solve to determine whether a given stimulus departs from those previously experienced. In computer science, this problem is solved efficiently using a data structure called a Bloom filter. We found that the fruit fly olfactory circuit evolved a variant of a Bloom filter to assess the novelty of odors. Compared with a traditional Bloom filter, the fly adjusts novelty responses based on two additional features: the similarity of an odor to previously experienced odors and the time elapsed since the odor was last experienced. We elaborate and validate a framework to predict novelty responses of fruit flies to given pairs of odors. We also translate insights from the fly circuit to develop a class of distance- and time-sensitive Bloom filters that outperform prior filters when evaluated on several biological and computational datasets. Overall, our work illuminates the algorithmic basis of an important neurobiological problem and offers strategies for novelty detection in computational systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysAnimalsDrosophilaModels, BiologicalNerve NetBloom filterscomputer sciencedata structuresfly olfactory circuitnovelty detection

Identifiers

PMID30509984
PMCPMC6304992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.