Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509937›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2019

Is One Sample Enough? β-Lactam Target Attainment and Penetration into Epithelial Lining Fluid Based on Multiple Bronchoalveolar Lavage Sampling Time Points in a Swine Pneumonia Model.

Ana Motos, Joseph L Kuti, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Antoni Torres, David P Nicolau

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana MotosCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Joseph L KutiCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Gianluigi Li BassiDivision of Animal Experimentation, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni TorresDivision of Animal Experimentation, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA david.nicolau@hhchealth.org.
Hartford Financial Services (United States)Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Describing the disposition of antimicrobial agents at the site of infection is crucial to guide optimal dosing for investigational agents. For antibiotics in development for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, concentrations in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of the lung are frequently determined from a bronchoscopy at a single time point. The influence of profiles constructed from a single ELF concentration point for each subject has never been reported. This study compares the pharmacokinetics of two β-lactams, ceftolozane and piperacillin, among different ELF sampling approaches using simulated human regimens in a swine pneumonia model. Plasma and ELF concentration-time profiles were characterized in two-compartment models by the use of robustly sampled ELF concentrations and by the random selection of one or two ELF concentrations from each swine. A 5,000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was performed for each model to define the ELF penetration, as described by the ratio of the area under the concentration curve (AUC) for ELF to the AUC for free drug in plasma (AUC

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCephalosporinsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLungMonte Carlo MethodPiperacillinPneumoniaPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftolozaneCephalosporinsPiperacillinBAL samplingMonte Carlo simulationpneumonia

Identifiers

PMID30509937
PMCPMC6355580
OpenAlexW2902669185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.