ArticleJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society2019
Controlled attenuation parameter: A measure of hepatic steatosis in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Article in Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective study of quantitative liver MRI in cystic fibrosis: feasibility and comparison to PUSH cohort ultrasound.Pediatric radiology · 2023Trial
- Characterization of glucose metabolism in youth with vs. without cystic fibrosis liver disease: A pilot study.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2022Article
- Lumacaftor/ivacaftor therapy is associated with reduced hepatic steatosis in cystic fibrosis patients.World journal of hepatology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatic steatosis is a common manifestation of CF-related liver disease(CFLD). Controlled attenuation parameter(CAP) measurement during transient elastography(TE) semiquantifies liver steatosis. We examined the relationship between CAP and CFLD severity, clinical factors and liver stiffness measurements(LSM).
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of CF patients seen for outpatient care between January 2013-March 2014. CFLD severity was categorized as no CFLD, CFLD without portal hypertension(PHTN) and CFLD with PHTN, based on published criteria.
results129 patients (median 18.4y; 57% male) had valid CAP. 70(54%) had no CFLD, 44(34%) CFLD without PHTN, and 15(12%) CFLD with PHTN. The median CAP was 210 dB/m (IQR 181-239). Steatosis(CAP ≥230 dB/m) was seen in 27% of subjects without CFLD, 48% in CFLD but no PHTN, and 20% in with CFLD and PHTN(P = .04). CAP was higher for subjects with CFLD without PHTN (P < .05). There was no CAP difference between subjects with no CFLD and those with CFLD and PHTN (P ≥ .65). LSM was not different between no CFLD and CFLD without PHTN (P = .07), but each of these groups had lower LSM compared to subjects with CFLD and PHTN(P < .001 for each). Except for direct bilirubin, CAP was not associated with clinical markers of liver disease.
conclusionCAP was normal in 86(67%) of patients with CF and was not associated with standard clinical markers of liver disease. CAP was higher in patients with liver disease, which could possibly reflect the loss of steatosis observed with progression to cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.