Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509323›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Disabled people's experiences of accessing reasonable adjustments in hospitals: a qualitative study.

Stuart Read, Pauline Heslop, Sue Turner, Victoria Mason-Angelow, Nadine Tilbury, Caroline Miles, Chris Hatton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stuart ReadNorah Fry Centre for Disability Studies, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
Pauline HeslopNorah Fry Centre for Disability Studies, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK. pauline.heslop@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8628-6868
Sue TurnerNational Development Team for Inclusion, First Floor, 30-32 Westgate Buildings, Bath, BA1 1EF, UK.
Victoria Mason-AngelowNorah Fry Centre for Disability Studies, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
Nadine TilburyNorah Fry Centre for Disability Studies, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
Caroline MilesNorah Fry Centre for Disability Studies, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
Chris HattonFaculty of Health and Medicine, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/M008339/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe UK Equality Act 2010 requires providers of health services to make changes or 'reasonable adjustments' to their practices in order to protect disabled people from discrimination or disadvantage when accessing care. Existing evidence suggests that despite this legislation, health services are not always providing reasonably adjusted care for disabled people. This paper presents the perspectives of disabled people themselves in relation to their experiences of accessing reasonable adjustments in hospitals in England.

methodsTwenty-one semi-structured interviews were held with disabled people who had a recent experience of hospital care in England. Participants were asked about the extent to which the hospital provided reasonably adjusted care, and if necessary, how they thought the provision of reasonable adjustments could be improved. Each interview was anonymised and transcribed, and the data analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants reported mixed experiences about whether and how reasonable adjustments were provided: some shared positive examples of good practice; others spoke about difficult encounters and limited provision. Recommendations made include a need for culture change in how reasonable adjustments are perceived and enacted; improvements in identifying the needs of disabled people; improvements to the hospital environment and the provision of information; and the need to involve disabled people themselves in the process of change.

conclusionsGaps remain in how reasonable adjustments are provided for disabled people accessing hospital care. It is important for hospital staff to listen to the perspectives of disabled people about the provision of reasonable adjustments, and make improvements as necessary. Hospital staff could also do more to share good practice in relation to the provision of reasonable adjustments to effectively inspire and embed positive change.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesAdolescentAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonnel, HospitalProfessional-Patient RelationsProfessional PracticeDisabled peopleEquality act 2010Hospital careReasonable adjustments

Identifiers

PMID30509323
PMCPMC6278140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.