Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30509322›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2018

Standardisation of synovial biopsy analyses in rheumatic diseases: a consensus of the EULAR Synovitis and OMERACT Synovial Tissue Biopsy Groups.

Aurélie Najm, Benoît Le Goff, Carl Orr, Rogier Thurlings, Juan D Cañete, Frances Humby, Stefano Alivernini, Antonio Manzo, Søren Andreas Just, Vasco C Romão and 14 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Aurélie NajmRheumatology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France. aurelie.najm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6008-503X
Benoît Le GoffRheumatology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Carl OrrThe Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Saint Vincent's University Hospital and Dublin Academic Medical Centre, University College Dublin, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Rogier ThurlingsInstitute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud UMC, Theodoor Craanenlaan 11, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Juan D CañeteHospital Clínic de Barcelona Rheumatology Department, Arthritis Unit, Barcelona, Spain and IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Frances HumbyCentre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, John Vane Science Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Stefano AliverniniDivision of Rheumatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Antonio ManzoRheumatology and Translational Immunology Research Laboratories (LaRIT), Division of Rheumatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation/University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
Søren Andreas JustDepartment of Medicine, Svendborg Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark.
Vasco C RomãoRheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa and Rheumatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal.
Veit KrennMVZ-Zentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Trier, Germany.
Ulf Müller-LadnerDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Giessen, Germany.
Olga AddimandaMedicine & Rheumatology Unit, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna and Department Of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
Sander W TasAmsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and Laboratory for Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Bologna, The Netherlands.
Maria StoenoiuDepartment of Rheumatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Laurent Meric de BellefonDepartment of Rheumatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Patrick DurezDepartment of Rheumatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Vibeke StrandDivision of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, Bruxelles, CA, USA.
Mihir D WechalekarRheumatology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Joao E FonsecaRheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa and Rheumatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal.
Bernard LauwerysDepartment of Rheumatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Ursula FearonDepartment of Molecular Rheumatology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Douglas J VealeThe Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Saint Vincent's University Hospital and Dublin Academic Medical Centre, University College Dublin, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
EULAR Synovitis Study Group and OMERACT Synovial Tissue Special Interest Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this global collaboration was to develop a consensual set of items for the analysis of synovial biopsies in clinical practice and translational research through the EULAR Synovitis Study Group (ESSG) and OMERACT Synovial Tissue Biopsy Group.

methodsParticipants were consulted through a modified Delphi method. Three sequential rounds occurred over 12 months. Members were sent a written questionnaire containing items divided into two parts. Items were identified and formulated based on a scoping review. The first part of the questionnaire referred to synovial biopsies in clinical practice including five subsections, and the second part to translational research with six subsections. Every participant was asked to score each item on a 5-point Likert scale. Items with a median score above 3.5 and a ≥ 70% agreement were selected for the next round. The last round was conducted orally at EULAR in June 2017.

resultsTwenty-seven participants from 19 centers were contacted by email. Twenty participants from 17 centers answered. Response rates for next rounds were 100%. For the first part relating to clinical practice, 20/44 items (45.5%) were selected. For the second part relating to translational research, 18/43 items (41.9%) were selected for the final set.

conclusionsWe herein propose a consensual set of analysis items to be used for synovial biopsies conducted in clinical practice and translational research.

Indexed as

BiopsyDelphi TechniqueHumansReference StandardsRheumatic DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesSynovial MembraneSynovitisTranslational Research, BiomedicalStandardisationSynovial biopsySynovial tissue analysisSynovium

Identifiers

PMID30509322
PMCPMC6276172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.